From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 20:36, 11 January 2021 (UTC) reply

California Farm Water Coalition

California Farm Water Coalition (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There is no indication that this organization has notability. This article has been unsourced for over 10 years and despite the first AfD being closed as "keep" no sources were ever added. The last AfD had no participation so I'm hoping we can come to a consensus this time.

Any sources that I can find are usually about it's executive director and/or trivial thus not meeting WP:ORGDEPTH or WP:ORG. Jay Jay What did I do? 04:04, 27 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Jay Jay What did I do? 04:04, 27 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. Jay Jay What did I do? 04:04, 27 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Jay Jay What did I do? 04:04, 27 December 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Delete we need to stop just acting as a lightly annotated guide to websites, which is what we are when articles are only sourced to organization websites. Despite the claims this is a "major player in politics" in the Afd discussion 8 years ago, the article lacks any sources that demonstrate this claim. 8 years is more than long enough to add such sourcing if it in fact existed. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 20:14, 28 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Barkeep49 ( talk) 02:02, 4 January 2021 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 20:36, 11 January 2021 (UTC) reply

California Farm Water Coalition

California Farm Water Coalition (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There is no indication that this organization has notability. This article has been unsourced for over 10 years and despite the first AfD being closed as "keep" no sources were ever added. The last AfD had no participation so I'm hoping we can come to a consensus this time.

Any sources that I can find are usually about it's executive director and/or trivial thus not meeting WP:ORGDEPTH or WP:ORG. Jay Jay What did I do? 04:04, 27 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Jay Jay What did I do? 04:04, 27 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. Jay Jay What did I do? 04:04, 27 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Jay Jay What did I do? 04:04, 27 December 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Delete we need to stop just acting as a lightly annotated guide to websites, which is what we are when articles are only sourced to organization websites. Despite the claims this is a "major player in politics" in the Afd discussion 8 years ago, the article lacks any sources that demonstrate this claim. 8 years is more than long enough to add such sourcing if it in fact existed. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 20:14, 28 December 2020 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Barkeep49 ( talk) 02:02, 4 January 2021 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook