The result was keep. JohnCD ( talk) 19:45, 25 March 2012 (UTC) reply
Article has been tagged for a number of years for a variety of issues, including lack of notability and having no reliable sources. It was actually tagged as a PROD in 2009, but the PROD was contested with the promise to introduce sources to the article. That never happened, and the article has been pretty much sitting here dormant since. The arguments for the PROD still apply, namely that there is nothing that distinguishes this particular non-profit as notable, and that while mention of the organization does appear in a few third party sources, they are trivial mentions at best. Rorshacma ( talk) 21:40, 16 March 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. JohnCD ( talk) 19:45, 25 March 2012 (UTC) reply
Article has been tagged for a number of years for a variety of issues, including lack of notability and having no reliable sources. It was actually tagged as a PROD in 2009, but the PROD was contested with the promise to introduce sources to the article. That never happened, and the article has been pretty much sitting here dormant since. The arguments for the PROD still apply, namely that there is nothing that distinguishes this particular non-profit as notable, and that while mention of the organization does appear in a few third party sources, they are trivial mentions at best. Rorshacma ( talk) 21:40, 16 March 2012 (UTC) reply