The result was keep. Cbrown1023 talk 18:17, 27 April 2008 (UTC) reply
Non-notable. Ziggy Saw dust 19:51, 21 April 2008 (UTC) reply
Hi,
this lobby firm is notable for its connections with a Scottish Parliament supported charitable venture; because it has employed former MSPs including a disgraced member of the House of Lords; because the organisation it is connected with was investigated by the Scottish Parliament and because it also includes a former Pfizer lobbyist also associated with the 'non lobbying' SPBE. This has been a matter of political controversy in scotland and has featured in the press regulatrly. I will add some more sources.
-- Davidmillerglasgow ( talk) 19:56, 21 April 2008 (UTC) reply
Keep - Well-referenced article, not deserving of deletion. Ecoleetage ( talk) 12:56, 22 April 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. Cbrown1023 talk 18:17, 27 April 2008 (UTC) reply
Non-notable. Ziggy Saw dust 19:51, 21 April 2008 (UTC) reply
Hi,
this lobby firm is notable for its connections with a Scottish Parliament supported charitable venture; because it has employed former MSPs including a disgraced member of the House of Lords; because the organisation it is connected with was investigated by the Scottish Parliament and because it also includes a former Pfizer lobbyist also associated with the 'non lobbying' SPBE. This has been a matter of political controversy in scotland and has featured in the press regulatrly. I will add some more sources.
-- Davidmillerglasgow ( talk) 19:56, 21 April 2008 (UTC) reply
Keep - Well-referenced article, not deserving of deletion. Ecoleetage ( talk) 12:56, 22 April 2008 (UTC) reply