The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Reviewed during NPP. No evidence of notability under either GNG or NSports.
Of the two sources, one is a dead link and appears it was a list. The other is just a list where they are an entry. Previously deleted. North8000 (
talk)
14:58, 16 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Keep – they played for a couple of seasons in the second league, and some of their players went on to play hundreds of games in the first league, and one of them played for the national team of Romania.
mihai.zamfir3009:41, 17 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: There have been newly added content since this article's nomination. Instead of considering this club's reputation, if we could have some source analysis, it might help close this divided discussion. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, LizRead!Talk!23:06, 1 March 2024 (UTC)reply
Delete as failing to pass the WP:GNG. The keep argument appears to be that the club at its peak reach the second division of Romanian football. This is not in and of itself a showing of notability, and seems to harken back to the NFOOTY days when we tried to assess full professional leagues before the practice was deprecated. The sources present in the article (assuming Google translated them accurately) indicate: (Source 1) The team was founded in 1936, played many years in lower leagues and merged with a another club in 2005. It never reached Division A, but did play for promotion in 2002; they lost. (Source 2) Database listing team standings/match results for 2004/5 season, with no reporting, history or analysis of the team. (Source 3) List of division standings for 2005-6 season (Source 4) What appears to be a newspaper style game story stating that the team lost to another team that was formed 48 hours prior to the match and was missing 5 starters. The story does state that 1500 spectators paid to watch the match, and does engage in some analysis about lack of support and funding for the team affecting their ability to play. (Source 5) List of division standings for 2006-7 season. On their face, sources 2, 3, and 5 count nothing for notability. Source 1 is a 3 sentence capsule summary for a "where are they now" article, and does not constitute
WP:SIGCOV. Source 4 potentially could count if the source itself is reliable and independent, which I really cannot assess. Since, at best, there is 1 good source for notability, the article should be deleted.
XymmaxSo let it be writtenSo let it be done01:42, 10 March 2024 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Reviewed during NPP. No evidence of notability under either GNG or NSports.
Of the two sources, one is a dead link and appears it was a list. The other is just a list where they are an entry. Previously deleted. North8000 (
talk)
14:58, 16 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Keep – they played for a couple of seasons in the second league, and some of their players went on to play hundreds of games in the first league, and one of them played for the national team of Romania.
mihai.zamfir3009:41, 17 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: There have been newly added content since this article's nomination. Instead of considering this club's reputation, if we could have some source analysis, it might help close this divided discussion. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, LizRead!Talk!23:06, 1 March 2024 (UTC)reply
Delete as failing to pass the WP:GNG. The keep argument appears to be that the club at its peak reach the second division of Romanian football. This is not in and of itself a showing of notability, and seems to harken back to the NFOOTY days when we tried to assess full professional leagues before the practice was deprecated. The sources present in the article (assuming Google translated them accurately) indicate: (Source 1) The team was founded in 1936, played many years in lower leagues and merged with a another club in 2005. It never reached Division A, but did play for promotion in 2002; they lost. (Source 2) Database listing team standings/match results for 2004/5 season, with no reporting, history or analysis of the team. (Source 3) List of division standings for 2005-6 season (Source 4) What appears to be a newspaper style game story stating that the team lost to another team that was formed 48 hours prior to the match and was missing 5 starters. The story does state that 1500 spectators paid to watch the match, and does engage in some analysis about lack of support and funding for the team affecting their ability to play. (Source 5) List of division standings for 2006-7 season. On their face, sources 2, 3, and 5 count nothing for notability. Source 1 is a 3 sentence capsule summary for a "where are they now" article, and does not constitute
WP:SIGCOV. Source 4 potentially could count if the source itself is reliable and independent, which I really cannot assess. Since, at best, there is 1 good source for notability, the article should be deleted.
XymmaxSo let it be writtenSo let it be done01:42, 10 March 2024 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.