- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. No prejudice against recreation as a redirect to CITV. Jenks24 ( talk) 14:23, 12 July 2014 (UTC)
- CITV Breakfast ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Delete: No refrences for the actual page, only for ITV4 and ITV2. SillyPotatoe ( talk) 09:05, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
- Keep the article needs more references not deleting. Theroadislong ( talk) 15:12, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
- Note - This discussion was never properly placed in the AfD logs. I have now placed the discussion under June 24's log; discussion should run for a week from today. ~ Super Hamster Talk Contribs 21:24, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. ~ Super Hamster Talk Contribs 21:26, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 01:34, 25 June 2014 (UTC)
- Delete Made-up branding for network's morning block of programming. Only links are Wiki-mirrors trying to spread out the concept that this block is named this way, but it's highly doubtful it's named this way except for industry sources only regarding ad sales. Weak redirect to CITV itself. Nate • ( chatter) 03:56, 25 June 2014 (UTC)
- Keep - It's not the most perfect of articles in the world but imho it simply needs tidying up not deleting. – Davey2010 • (talk) 02:22, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
-
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica 1000 20:48, 4 July 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. No prejudice against recreation as a redirect to CITV. Jenks24 ( talk) 14:23, 12 July 2014 (UTC)
- CITV Breakfast ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Delete: No refrences for the actual page, only for ITV4 and ITV2. SillyPotatoe ( talk) 09:05, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
- Keep the article needs more references not deleting. Theroadislong ( talk) 15:12, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
- Note - This discussion was never properly placed in the AfD logs. I have now placed the discussion under June 24's log; discussion should run for a week from today. ~ Super Hamster Talk Contribs 21:24, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. ~ Super Hamster Talk Contribs 21:26, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 01:34, 25 June 2014 (UTC)
- Delete Made-up branding for network's morning block of programming. Only links are Wiki-mirrors trying to spread out the concept that this block is named this way, but it's highly doubtful it's named this way except for industry sources only regarding ad sales. Weak redirect to CITV itself. Nate • ( chatter) 03:56, 25 June 2014 (UTC)
- Keep - It's not the most perfect of articles in the world but imho it simply needs tidying up not deleting. – Davey2010 • (talk) 02:22, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
-
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica 1000 20:48, 4 July 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.