The result was Keep.
SynergeticMaggot 13:03, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
reply
non-notable according to WP:BAND, it was previously deleted in accordance to WP:PROD Kungfu Adam ( talk) 10:53, 27 July 2006 (UTC) reply
Keep This article should be kept. I have reviewed the Notability Guidelines, and I believe that it falls well within the boundaries given. For example:
Another argument I have is that if you do a search for C-Tec on this site, you will find two pages worth of results that link to this article. If it is not notable, then why would it be so frequently mentioned?
By these arguments, I think this article certainly deserves to stay on Wikipedia. I do not understand where the issue arises that they are not notable enough to have their own article.
Addendum: I would also like to refer to their All Music Guide entry. If this is considered a "non-trivial" publication, then it verifies all of my arguments above. Sovex 16:45, 27 July 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Keep.
SynergeticMaggot 13:03, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
reply
non-notable according to WP:BAND, it was previously deleted in accordance to WP:PROD Kungfu Adam ( talk) 10:53, 27 July 2006 (UTC) reply
Keep This article should be kept. I have reviewed the Notability Guidelines, and I believe that it falls well within the boundaries given. For example:
Another argument I have is that if you do a search for C-Tec on this site, you will find two pages worth of results that link to this article. If it is not notable, then why would it be so frequently mentioned?
By these arguments, I think this article certainly deserves to stay on Wikipedia. I do not understand where the issue arises that they are not notable enough to have their own article.
Addendum: I would also like to refer to their All Music Guide entry. If this is considered a "non-trivial" publication, then it verifies all of my arguments above. Sovex 16:45, 27 July 2006 (UTC) reply