The result was delete. Normally a low-participation AFD like this would be relisted, but in this case I think it's safe to let silence speak consent. Beeblebrox ( talk) 00:36, 22 June 2010 (UTC) reply
Largely OR and SYNTH stuff, with no particular encyclopedic value. It is more an exercise in "proving" that the Greek Royal Family has some sort of legitimate right to the Greek throne, even though their claim never rested on this fact. Given the names present in the list, most European royals share in some Byzantine descent, and in no way is the Greek Royal Family any more "Byzantine-descended" than say, the British Royal Family... Cf. also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bulgarian ancestry of royals of Bulgaria & Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Byzantine ancestry of Norwegian Royal Family for similar cases. Constantine ✍ 13:02, 14 June 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Normally a low-participation AFD like this would be relisted, but in this case I think it's safe to let silence speak consent. Beeblebrox ( talk) 00:36, 22 June 2010 (UTC) reply
Largely OR and SYNTH stuff, with no particular encyclopedic value. It is more an exercise in "proving" that the Greek Royal Family has some sort of legitimate right to the Greek throne, even though their claim never rested on this fact. Given the names present in the list, most European royals share in some Byzantine descent, and in no way is the Greek Royal Family any more "Byzantine-descended" than say, the British Royal Family... Cf. also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bulgarian ancestry of royals of Bulgaria & Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Byzantine ancestry of Norwegian Royal Family for similar cases. Constantine ✍ 13:02, 14 June 2010 (UTC) reply