Burr dilemma
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Burr dilemma ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not notable enough. The page seems to have only one or two citations to a pair of closely-related papers by the same author, both mostly speculative. Closed Limelike Curves ( talk) 01:38, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:16, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
- Maybe it can be merged with a related article. --
Erel Segal (
talk)
15:32, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
- I think that a brief mention could be added to bullet voting. Closed Limelike Curves ( talk) 04:04, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
- Keep, because the citations in the article aren't the only ones that exist. Though, I wouldn't be against merging it with a related article if a sufficiently related one can be found. Loki ( talk) 04:47, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
- Delete: Looking through the Google Scholar results Loki has linked to, I could not find any detailed discussion of the Burr dilemma. Many of the articles do not use the phrase "Burr dilemma" and seem to be included in the search solely because they include Jack Nagal's paper in their list of references. Mgp28 ( talk) 14:41, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Please identify an existing target article when proposing a Merge or Redirect or your argument will be pretty much dismissed as it can't be realized.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 01:10, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
- Weak keep I checked through the first dozen articles listed as citing the relevant study [1], and about half of those contain a statement of the type "Nagel (2007) refers to this as the Burr dilemma" or "Nagel offers a critique of this type of voting by [minimal summary]". That is not exactly grand notability but I think it suffices to show a certain amount of uptake and acknowledgement in the field. A merge would certainly work as well though. -- Elmidae ( talk · contribs) 11:55, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
Burr dilemma
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Burr dilemma ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not notable enough. The page seems to have only one or two citations to a pair of closely-related papers by the same author, both mostly speculative. Closed Limelike Curves ( talk) 01:38, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:16, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
- Maybe it can be merged with a related article. --
Erel Segal (
talk)
15:32, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
- I think that a brief mention could be added to bullet voting. Closed Limelike Curves ( talk) 04:04, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
- Keep, because the citations in the article aren't the only ones that exist. Though, I wouldn't be against merging it with a related article if a sufficiently related one can be found. Loki ( talk) 04:47, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
- Delete: Looking through the Google Scholar results Loki has linked to, I could not find any detailed discussion of the Burr dilemma. Many of the articles do not use the phrase "Burr dilemma" and seem to be included in the search solely because they include Jack Nagal's paper in their list of references. Mgp28 ( talk) 14:41, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Please identify an existing target article when proposing a Merge or Redirect or your argument will be pretty much dismissed as it can't be realized.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 01:10, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
- Weak keep I checked through the first dozen articles listed as citing the relevant study [1], and about half of those contain a statement of the type "Nagel (2007) refers to this as the Burr dilemma" or "Nagel offers a critique of this type of voting by [minimal summary]". That is not exactly grand notability but I think it suffices to show a certain amount of uptake and acknowledgement in the field. A merge would certainly work as well though. -- Elmidae ( talk · contribs) 11:55, 10 July 2024 (UTC)