- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Novato, California. Vanamonde ( Talk) 04:55, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Burdell, California ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Another railroad facility mistakenly called a populated place by GNIS. Durham and Gudde both call it a rail facility on the Northwestern Pacific RR. No other indications that it was a community. Does not meet notability standards. Glendoremus ( talk) 21:40, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 21:50, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 21:50, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
- Redirect to Novato, California: WP:GEOLAND "informal regions of a state, unofficial neighborhoods, etc. – any of which could be considered notable on a case-by-case basis, given non-trivial coverage in multiple, independent reliable sources.", there is nothing that meets non-trivial coverage in multiple, independent reliable sources. If someone feels it merit mention, the sentence could be copied into target. // Timothy :: talk 01:49, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
- delete I'm not seeing anything to contradict the "just a rail spot" reading, and I don't agree that it should be redirected to Novato since it isn't actually in the town. Mangoe ( talk) 14:00, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Novato, California. Vanamonde ( Talk) 04:55, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Burdell, California ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Another railroad facility mistakenly called a populated place by GNIS. Durham and Gudde both call it a rail facility on the Northwestern Pacific RR. No other indications that it was a community. Does not meet notability standards. Glendoremus ( talk) 21:40, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 21:50, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 21:50, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
- Redirect to Novato, California: WP:GEOLAND "informal regions of a state, unofficial neighborhoods, etc. – any of which could be considered notable on a case-by-case basis, given non-trivial coverage in multiple, independent reliable sources.", there is nothing that meets non-trivial coverage in multiple, independent reliable sources. If someone feels it merit mention, the sentence could be copied into target. // Timothy :: talk 01:49, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
- delete I'm not seeing anything to contradict the "just a rail spot" reading, and I don't agree that it should be redirected to Novato since it isn't actually in the town. Mangoe ( talk) 14:00, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.