- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Mojo Hand ( talk) 20:49, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
Bulgarian Rhinologic Society
- Bulgarian Rhinologic Society ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:ORG badly. I can find no independent coverage of this organization. It's possible there are sources in Bulgarian, but I doubt it. There's nary a mention in English language independent sources.— alf laylah wa laylah ( talk) 19:00, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bulgaria-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 17:15, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 17:15, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 17:15, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Randykitty ( talk) 18:10, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
-
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten ( talk) 01:41, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
- Along with the articles listed here (by me and Randykitty) and here (by January), this is part of a spam/promotion related to OMICS. All of them should probably be deleted; they are also likely candidates for recreation by sock puppets. -- JBL ( talk) 14:57, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
- Weak delete Seems to be a decent society. They were probably a bit naive in partnering with OMICS. The OMICS journal that they partnered with is absolutely not notable. The journal Rhinology that was mentioned in the article is notable, but there is no link apparent with this society. The website does not give an idea how large this society is, but Bulgaria is not a large country and this is a minor medical specialty, so probably the society is quite small. No independent references. I have stubbified the article, just in case it would be kept. -- Randykitty ( talk) 17:23, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
- Weak delete per Randy. I'd be happy to reconsider if more referenced material can be provided. John Vandenberg ( chat) 21:13, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Mojo Hand ( talk) 20:49, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
Bulgarian Rhinologic Society
- Bulgarian Rhinologic Society ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:ORG badly. I can find no independent coverage of this organization. It's possible there are sources in Bulgarian, but I doubt it. There's nary a mention in English language independent sources.— alf laylah wa laylah ( talk) 19:00, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bulgaria-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 17:15, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 17:15, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 17:15, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Randykitty ( talk) 18:10, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
-
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten ( talk) 01:41, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
- Along with the articles listed here (by me and Randykitty) and here (by January), this is part of a spam/promotion related to OMICS. All of them should probably be deleted; they are also likely candidates for recreation by sock puppets. -- JBL ( talk) 14:57, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
- Weak delete Seems to be a decent society. They were probably a bit naive in partnering with OMICS. The OMICS journal that they partnered with is absolutely not notable. The journal Rhinology that was mentioned in the article is notable, but there is no link apparent with this society. The website does not give an idea how large this society is, but Bulgaria is not a large country and this is a minor medical specialty, so probably the society is quite small. No independent references. I have stubbified the article, just in case it would be kept. -- Randykitty ( talk) 17:23, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
- Weak delete per Randy. I'd be happy to reconsider if more referenced material can be provided. John Vandenberg ( chat) 21:13, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.