From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker talk 23:10, 12 August 2014 (UTC) reply

Bukit Panjang Plaza

Bukit Panjang Plaza (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't seem to meet WP:NOTABILITY Boleyn ( talk) 18:53, 5 August 2014 (UTC) reply

  • Delete I agree that it is advertising and doesn't follow wikipedia policies. Jab843 ( talk) 19:33, 5 August 2014 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Singapore-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 01:13, 6 August 2014 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Shopping malls-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 01:13, 6 August 2014 (UTC) reply
  • Delete- No reliable independent sourcing, and the article does seem a touch too promotional. Reyk YO! 05:49, 11 August 2014 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker talk 23:10, 12 August 2014 (UTC) reply

Bukit Panjang Plaza

Bukit Panjang Plaza (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't seem to meet WP:NOTABILITY Boleyn ( talk) 18:53, 5 August 2014 (UTC) reply

  • Delete I agree that it is advertising and doesn't follow wikipedia policies. Jab843 ( talk) 19:33, 5 August 2014 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Singapore-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 01:13, 6 August 2014 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Shopping malls-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 01:13, 6 August 2014 (UTC) reply
  • Delete- No reliable independent sourcing, and the article does seem a touch too promotional. Reyk YO! 05:49, 11 August 2014 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook