The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Non-notable indie game. One brief article about its trailer (and two non-independent sources) is not sufficient to support a claim of notability.
BilCat (
talk)
11:07, 7 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete, technically per myself since the nomination rationale is my PROD rationale :) De-PROD'd by creator with rationale "Important game" - but of course no sources were added to substantiate this. ♠
PMC♠
(talk)11:12, 7 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Keep. A quick Google search turned up numerous RS articles about it. A few below:
Comment The main problem about this one is that the coverage it gets from reliable sources is purely
WP:ROUTINE and expected for any video game announced: "to launch", "announced", "set to release", "out today", "comes to a certain platform" and other things, with basic info about the game slightly altered from press releases. That being said, I found a very good source detailing the game's development at
Red Bull[1], but that is it sadly. The Gamer seems to be situational leaning to unreliable source per the discussion at
Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Video_games/Sources#THEGAMER, questionably/likely unreliable like Go Nintendo and Nintendo Insider mentioned here and everything else is in lines of the RPS/Destructoid/NLife/GRadar routine sources posted above (also RPGSite, 4Gamer or Video Games Chronicle). That led me to conclusion that this game fails
WP:GNG. It may be notable after the consoles release at the end of this month, but not now and at this point of time.
Jovanmilic97 (
talk)
10:21, 9 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Comment Striking my vote due to the newfound reference at RPGSite (which appeared after the AfD has started!). That, the Vandal source and Red Bull article should make it for a
WP:GNG pass now. Plus, I am positive it will be reviewed by Nintendo Life and/or Nintendo World Report when the game releases on Switch.
Jovanmilic97 (
talk)
15:52, 23 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Keep The game has gotten much more exposure thanks to the console release, and the article's pageviews have greatly increased since the beginning of May. More people are interested in the game, so keeping this article is the right thing to do. The Switch version already has
amazing reviews. from critics.
Condontdoit296 (
talk)
23:49, 28 May 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Non-notable indie game. One brief article about its trailer (and two non-independent sources) is not sufficient to support a claim of notability.
BilCat (
talk)
11:07, 7 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete, technically per myself since the nomination rationale is my PROD rationale :) De-PROD'd by creator with rationale "Important game" - but of course no sources were added to substantiate this. ♠
PMC♠
(talk)11:12, 7 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Keep. A quick Google search turned up numerous RS articles about it. A few below:
Comment The main problem about this one is that the coverage it gets from reliable sources is purely
WP:ROUTINE and expected for any video game announced: "to launch", "announced", "set to release", "out today", "comes to a certain platform" and other things, with basic info about the game slightly altered from press releases. That being said, I found a very good source detailing the game's development at
Red Bull[1], but that is it sadly. The Gamer seems to be situational leaning to unreliable source per the discussion at
Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Video_games/Sources#THEGAMER, questionably/likely unreliable like Go Nintendo and Nintendo Insider mentioned here and everything else is in lines of the RPS/Destructoid/NLife/GRadar routine sources posted above (also RPGSite, 4Gamer or Video Games Chronicle). That led me to conclusion that this game fails
WP:GNG. It may be notable after the consoles release at the end of this month, but not now and at this point of time.
Jovanmilic97 (
talk)
10:21, 9 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Comment Striking my vote due to the newfound reference at RPGSite (which appeared after the AfD has started!). That, the Vandal source and Red Bull article should make it for a
WP:GNG pass now. Plus, I am positive it will be reviewed by Nintendo Life and/or Nintendo World Report when the game releases on Switch.
Jovanmilic97 (
talk)
15:52, 23 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Keep The game has gotten much more exposure thanks to the console release, and the article's pageviews have greatly increased since the beginning of May. More people are interested in the game, so keeping this article is the right thing to do. The Switch version already has
amazing reviews. from critics.
Condontdoit296 (
talk)
23:49, 28 May 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.