The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
If this is a town, it should meet
WP:NPLACE. However, I could not find sources to prove it, and the sources originally added did not mention it. The creator has been banned.
Boleyn (
talk)
12:56, 23 October 2023 (UTC)reply
speedy delete without prejudice to recreation with sources It's bad enough that we have to dig through all the geostubs to verify that they aren't misrepresenting their database sources (because so many are bogus), but nothing is lost by deleting those that are unsourced. It is colossal waste of time to have multiple people chasing around for sources, when it could be the one person making a sourced article, were that possible.
Mangoe (
talk)
13:58, 23 October 2023 (UTC)reply
Keep Added 4 new references to the above unreferenced article including the one (Dawn newspaper) supplied by
Oaktree b above. The other 3 archived references are by the Government of Pakistan and the Government of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa. In my view, it meets
WP:NPLACE now...
Ngrewal1 (
talk)
21:30, 24 October 2023 (UTC)reply
Keep. Verified as a legally, recognised populated place under
WP:GEOLAND gives Broze a presumption of notability. We should be trying our best to expand the article rather than delete.
Rupples (
talk)
05:42, 30 October 2023 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
If this is a town, it should meet
WP:NPLACE. However, I could not find sources to prove it, and the sources originally added did not mention it. The creator has been banned.
Boleyn (
talk)
12:56, 23 October 2023 (UTC)reply
speedy delete without prejudice to recreation with sources It's bad enough that we have to dig through all the geostubs to verify that they aren't misrepresenting their database sources (because so many are bogus), but nothing is lost by deleting those that are unsourced. It is colossal waste of time to have multiple people chasing around for sources, when it could be the one person making a sourced article, were that possible.
Mangoe (
talk)
13:58, 23 October 2023 (UTC)reply
Keep Added 4 new references to the above unreferenced article including the one (Dawn newspaper) supplied by
Oaktree b above. The other 3 archived references are by the Government of Pakistan and the Government of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa. In my view, it meets
WP:NPLACE now...
Ngrewal1 (
talk)
21:30, 24 October 2023 (UTC)reply
Keep. Verified as a legally, recognised populated place under
WP:GEOLAND gives Broze a presumption of notability. We should be trying our best to expand the article rather than delete.
Rupples (
talk)
05:42, 30 October 2023 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.