- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Argument to redirect is undercut by the absence of a good target. Vanamonde ( Talk) 15:46, 17 March 2023 (UTC)
Brooke Marie Bridges
AfDs for this article:
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Brooke Marie Bridges ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No coverage for a GNG pass and no evidence of an NACTOR pass. QuietHere ( talk) 11:45, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and California. QuietHere ( talk) 11:45, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 15:33, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
- Redirect to
Ned's Declassified School Survival Guide, as that seems to be a show where she had one of her most notable roles. I think that's the best we can do for now.
Historyday01 (
talk)
05:07, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
- @
Historyday01 I'm not sure a redirect is appropriate given she has multiple notable roles, including another which is listed first in the lead. That may just be a matter of chronology, but if she is truly "best known" for both of those roles then redirecting to one, especially a page that doesn't even link back to her directly so likely has no information about her specifically, is probably not the best move. I won't object to this closing as a redirect if that's preferred, but there's my two cents on the matter.
QuietHere (
talk)
15:44, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
- That's true she has multiple notable roles, but I think a redirect is better than nothing.
Historyday01 (
talk)
16:29, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
- In general I'd agree, but in this case since it'd be going somewhere that doesn't inform readers about the subject they're searching for, I think it'd be better for the name to lead to a search which directs to multiple pages that directly mention her. QuietHere ( talk) 01:19, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
- That's true she has multiple notable roles, but I think a redirect is better than nothing.
Historyday01 (
talk)
16:29, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
- @
Historyday01 I'm not sure a redirect is appropriate given she has multiple notable roles, including another which is listed first in the lead. That may just be a matter of chronology, but if she is truly "best known" for both of those roles then redirecting to one, especially a page that doesn't even link back to her directly so likely has no information about her specifically, is probably not the best move. I won't object to this closing as a redirect if that's preferred, but there's my two cents on the matter.
QuietHere (
talk)
15:44, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – filelakeshoe ( t / c) 🐱 13:23, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Not notable and mentioned in multiple places (not suitable for redirecting). Avilich ( talk) 18:21, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
- Note: Recent additions by Techoliver298 include multiple Instagram sources and one from the subject's business website, about which I found no independent coverage. Has not changed my mind about deleting at all. QuietHere ( talk) 20:25, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
- Delete: BLPs need clearly Ind RS for content and notability. Above, article, BEFORE showed no SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth. No opinion on redirect. // Timothy :: talk 10:32, 17 March 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Argument to redirect is undercut by the absence of a good target. Vanamonde ( Talk) 15:46, 17 March 2023 (UTC)
Brooke Marie Bridges
AfDs for this article:
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Brooke Marie Bridges ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No coverage for a GNG pass and no evidence of an NACTOR pass. QuietHere ( talk) 11:45, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and California. QuietHere ( talk) 11:45, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 15:33, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
- Redirect to
Ned's Declassified School Survival Guide, as that seems to be a show where she had one of her most notable roles. I think that's the best we can do for now.
Historyday01 (
talk)
05:07, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
- @
Historyday01 I'm not sure a redirect is appropriate given she has multiple notable roles, including another which is listed first in the lead. That may just be a matter of chronology, but if she is truly "best known" for both of those roles then redirecting to one, especially a page that doesn't even link back to her directly so likely has no information about her specifically, is probably not the best move. I won't object to this closing as a redirect if that's preferred, but there's my two cents on the matter.
QuietHere (
talk)
15:44, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
- That's true she has multiple notable roles, but I think a redirect is better than nothing.
Historyday01 (
talk)
16:29, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
- In general I'd agree, but in this case since it'd be going somewhere that doesn't inform readers about the subject they're searching for, I think it'd be better for the name to lead to a search which directs to multiple pages that directly mention her. QuietHere ( talk) 01:19, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
- That's true she has multiple notable roles, but I think a redirect is better than nothing.
Historyday01 (
talk)
16:29, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
- @
Historyday01 I'm not sure a redirect is appropriate given she has multiple notable roles, including another which is listed first in the lead. That may just be a matter of chronology, but if she is truly "best known" for both of those roles then redirecting to one, especially a page that doesn't even link back to her directly so likely has no information about her specifically, is probably not the best move. I won't object to this closing as a redirect if that's preferred, but there's my two cents on the matter.
QuietHere (
talk)
15:44, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – filelakeshoe ( t / c) 🐱 13:23, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Not notable and mentioned in multiple places (not suitable for redirecting). Avilich ( talk) 18:21, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
- Note: Recent additions by Techoliver298 include multiple Instagram sources and one from the subject's business website, about which I found no independent coverage. Has not changed my mind about deleting at all. QuietHere ( talk) 20:25, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
- Delete: BLPs need clearly Ind RS for content and notability. Above, article, BEFORE showed no SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth. No opinion on redirect. // Timothy :: talk 10:32, 17 March 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.