- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Nakon 02:29, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
Broadclose House
- Broadclose House ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I couldn't establish that this meets WP:NOTABILITY. Pinging those who have looked at its notability before: Jbhunley, Necrothesp. Boleyn ( talk) 08:40, 30 March 2015 (UTC) Boleyn ( talk) 08:40, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp ( talk) 09:17, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp ( talk) 09:17, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
- Comment. I deprodded because this house is Grade II-listed and I think it needs further discussion. Grade II listing is not usually seen as a definite keep, but it is at least an indication of some notability. -- Necrothesp ( talk) 09:17, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
- Comment - I found nothing on a cursory search. When the article was created it looked like it was to support an estate agent's listing. There was a web link to the listing in this version of the article with more information. Jbh ( talk) 10:49, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
- Delete - Nothing I can find on this building supports its notability per WP:GEOFEAT. No coverage in RS to verify or sustain an article per WP:NRV. Jbh ( talk) 01:04, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. I concur with previous statements.--Esprit15d • talk • contribs 14:12, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Nakon 02:29, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
Broadclose House
- Broadclose House ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I couldn't establish that this meets WP:NOTABILITY. Pinging those who have looked at its notability before: Jbhunley, Necrothesp. Boleyn ( talk) 08:40, 30 March 2015 (UTC) Boleyn ( talk) 08:40, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp ( talk) 09:17, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp ( talk) 09:17, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
- Comment. I deprodded because this house is Grade II-listed and I think it needs further discussion. Grade II listing is not usually seen as a definite keep, but it is at least an indication of some notability. -- Necrothesp ( talk) 09:17, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
- Comment - I found nothing on a cursory search. When the article was created it looked like it was to support an estate agent's listing. There was a web link to the listing in this version of the article with more information. Jbh ( talk) 10:49, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
- Delete - Nothing I can find on this building supports its notability per WP:GEOFEAT. No coverage in RS to verify or sustain an article per WP:NRV. Jbh ( talk) 01:04, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. I concur with previous statements.--Esprit15d • talk • contribs 14:12, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.