The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Keep: The nominator seems to quickly want this article deleted instead of letting other users find more sources on this actress and lacking patience. -
FilmandTVFan28 (
talk) 06:19, 21 June 2014 (UTC)reply
Actually, I would be happy to see this biography improved to the point of it meeting Wikipedia's guidelines. Your 'keep' vote has no policy basis.
Binksternet (
talk) 15:32, 21 June 2014 (UTC)reply
Keep - appears to be properly cited per
WP:GNG and meets
WP:ENTERTAINER. Comment - perhaps AfDing just a couple of these voice actors to see if consensus had changed would have been a much better approach so as not to waste the time of other editors.
VMS Mosaic (
talk) 06:51, 21 June 2014 (UTC)reply
Can you point to the specific cites which support GNG or ENTERTAINER? I don't see any of them establishing notability. To me, it looks like Karbowski performed in minor roles and dubbed some English voices with little fanfare. Her wedding photos, her agency promo piece and her resume don't count, and the passing mentions don't count.
Binksternet (
talk) 15:32, 21 June 2014 (UTC)reply
Keep voice actress who made dozens of appearances in anime conventions, and stars in a number of titles. If you're questioning why the resume sources are used, it can be replaced by secondary sources. -
AngusWOOF (
talk) 00:34, 22 June 2014 (UTC)reply
Keep per
WP:BEFORE, A ton of sources have been found by AngusWoof. If the nom had issue with
WP:ENTERTAINER then he should have just gone and made a discussion about it before placing these all up for AfD. -
Knowledgekid87 (
talk) 18:43, 23 June 2014 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Keep: The nominator seems to quickly want this article deleted instead of letting other users find more sources on this actress and lacking patience. -
FilmandTVFan28 (
talk) 06:19, 21 June 2014 (UTC)reply
Actually, I would be happy to see this biography improved to the point of it meeting Wikipedia's guidelines. Your 'keep' vote has no policy basis.
Binksternet (
talk) 15:32, 21 June 2014 (UTC)reply
Keep - appears to be properly cited per
WP:GNG and meets
WP:ENTERTAINER. Comment - perhaps AfDing just a couple of these voice actors to see if consensus had changed would have been a much better approach so as not to waste the time of other editors.
VMS Mosaic (
talk) 06:51, 21 June 2014 (UTC)reply
Can you point to the specific cites which support GNG or ENTERTAINER? I don't see any of them establishing notability. To me, it looks like Karbowski performed in minor roles and dubbed some English voices with little fanfare. Her wedding photos, her agency promo piece and her resume don't count, and the passing mentions don't count.
Binksternet (
talk) 15:32, 21 June 2014 (UTC)reply
Keep voice actress who made dozens of appearances in anime conventions, and stars in a number of titles. If you're questioning why the resume sources are used, it can be replaced by secondary sources. -
AngusWOOF (
talk) 00:34, 22 June 2014 (UTC)reply
Keep per
WP:BEFORE, A ton of sources have been found by AngusWoof. If the nom had issue with
WP:ENTERTAINER then he should have just gone and made a discussion about it before placing these all up for AfD. -
Knowledgekid87 (
talk) 18:43, 23 June 2014 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.