The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Puffed and advertorial with there still being notihng minimally better convincing thus this would be best deleted entirely, my own searches have found nothing convincingly better.
SwisterTwistertalk 21:08, 8 July 2016 (UTC)reply
Comment – Below are a couple
bylined news article sources that are not press releases. This is evidenced in part by utilizing Google searches using the titles of these article, in which links are only present for these articles themselves, as opposed to press releases, which typically have the same article hosted on many various websites. North America1000 10:25, 9 July 2016 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, YellowDingo(talk) 00:14, 16 July 2016 (UTC)reply
Comment – Another user added additional sources within the source list above, which I titled "More sources". North America1000 02:37, 16 July 2016 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Anarchyte(
work |
talk) 11:04, 23 July 2016 (UTC)reply
Keep: Plenty of sources including reliable (online) magazines/news sites. Article problems (a little bit one sided point of view) could be balanced later.
Pavlor (
talk) 10:30, 24 July 2016 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Puffed and advertorial with there still being notihng minimally better convincing thus this would be best deleted entirely, my own searches have found nothing convincingly better.
SwisterTwistertalk 21:08, 8 July 2016 (UTC)reply
Comment – Below are a couple
bylined news article sources that are not press releases. This is evidenced in part by utilizing Google searches using the titles of these article, in which links are only present for these articles themselves, as opposed to press releases, which typically have the same article hosted on many various websites. North America1000 10:25, 9 July 2016 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, YellowDingo(talk) 00:14, 16 July 2016 (UTC)reply
Comment – Another user added additional sources within the source list above, which I titled "More sources". North America1000 02:37, 16 July 2016 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Anarchyte(
work |
talk) 11:04, 23 July 2016 (UTC)reply
Keep: Plenty of sources including reliable (online) magazines/news sites. Article problems (a little bit one sided point of view) could be balanced later.
Pavlor (
talk) 10:30, 24 July 2016 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.