From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Anarchyte ( work | talk) 07:45, 30 July 2016 (UTC) reply

Bright Computing

Bright Computing (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Puffed and advertorial with there still being notihng minimally better convincing thus this would be best deleted entirely, my own searches have found nothing convincingly better. SwisterTwister talk 21:08, 8 July 2016 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 21:09, 8 July 2016 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 21:09, 8 July 2016 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 10:19, 9 July 2016 (UTC) reply
  • Comment – Below are a couple bylined news article sources that are not press releases. This is evidenced in part by utilizing Google searches using the titles of these article, in which links are only present for these articles themselves, as opposed to press releases, which typically have the same article hosted on many various websites. North America 1000 10:25, 9 July 2016 (UTC) reply

References


More sources

— Preceding unsigned comment added by MGR1boston ( talkcontribs) 21:28, 13 July 2016 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Yellow Dingo  (talk) 00:14, 16 July 2016 (UTC) reply
  • Comment – Another user added additional sources within the source list above, which I titled "More sources". North America 1000 02:37, 16 July 2016 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Anarchyte ( work | talk) 11:04, 23 July 2016 (UTC) reply
  • Keep: Plenty of sources including reliable (online) magazines/news sites. Article problems (a little bit one sided point of view) could be balanced later. Pavlor ( talk) 10:30, 24 July 2016 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Anarchyte ( work | talk) 07:45, 30 July 2016 (UTC) reply

Bright Computing

Bright Computing (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Puffed and advertorial with there still being notihng minimally better convincing thus this would be best deleted entirely, my own searches have found nothing convincingly better. SwisterTwister talk 21:08, 8 July 2016 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 21:09, 8 July 2016 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 21:09, 8 July 2016 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 10:19, 9 July 2016 (UTC) reply
  • Comment – Below are a couple bylined news article sources that are not press releases. This is evidenced in part by utilizing Google searches using the titles of these article, in which links are only present for these articles themselves, as opposed to press releases, which typically have the same article hosted on many various websites. North America 1000 10:25, 9 July 2016 (UTC) reply

References


More sources

— Preceding unsigned comment added by MGR1boston ( talkcontribs) 21:28, 13 July 2016 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Yellow Dingo  (talk) 00:14, 16 July 2016 (UTC) reply
  • Comment – Another user added additional sources within the source list above, which I titled "More sources". North America 1000 02:37, 16 July 2016 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Anarchyte ( work | talk) 11:04, 23 July 2016 (UTC) reply
  • Keep: Plenty of sources including reliable (online) magazines/news sites. Article problems (a little bit one sided point of view) could be balanced later. Pavlor ( talk) 10:30, 24 July 2016 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook