The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Finishing nomination for
User:174.58.224.221, who had this to say on the talkpage: "Qualifies for deletion: 4. Advertising or other spam without relevant content (but not an article about an advertising-related subject) This is nothing but existing technology with a new interface (phone) and the whole article reads like an ad, hopefully now that it's been featured on 'shark tank' someone more versed in WP deletion can get rid of this trash". I have no opinion on this one (concern could be fixed by
WP:NOTCLEANUP, but I'm not sure if it meets the
WP:GNG bar).
Ansh66607:00, 8 October 2013 (UTC)reply
Keep Meets
WP:GNG with coverage in PC Mag, CBS, Tech Crunch, Venture Beat. Not a great article, but while it doesn't offer a rounded view, there is factual information which can be referenced to reliable sources. --
Colapeninsula (
talk)
11:39, 8 October 2013 (UTC)reply
Damn, how does everyone manage to find all of these sources for everything? My Google comes up with literally nothing half the time...
Ansh66617:24, 8 October 2013 (UTC)reply
I don't understand and have not seen this sort of nomination before. Did
174.58.224.221 approach you and ask for help with this nomination? If not, it is definitely your nomination. If so, that doesn't relieve you of
WP:BEFORE responsibilities or take away your authority to withdraw. ~
KvnG14:33, 12 October 2013 (UTC)reply
174.IP put up the deletion tag and a rationale on the talkpage. IIRC unregistered users can't create new AfD pages, so I finished it for them.
Ansh66618:26, 12 October 2013 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Finishing nomination for
User:174.58.224.221, who had this to say on the talkpage: "Qualifies for deletion: 4. Advertising or other spam without relevant content (but not an article about an advertising-related subject) This is nothing but existing technology with a new interface (phone) and the whole article reads like an ad, hopefully now that it's been featured on 'shark tank' someone more versed in WP deletion can get rid of this trash". I have no opinion on this one (concern could be fixed by
WP:NOTCLEANUP, but I'm not sure if it meets the
WP:GNG bar).
Ansh66607:00, 8 October 2013 (UTC)reply
Keep Meets
WP:GNG with coverage in PC Mag, CBS, Tech Crunch, Venture Beat. Not a great article, but while it doesn't offer a rounded view, there is factual information which can be referenced to reliable sources. --
Colapeninsula (
talk)
11:39, 8 October 2013 (UTC)reply
Damn, how does everyone manage to find all of these sources for everything? My Google comes up with literally nothing half the time...
Ansh66617:24, 8 October 2013 (UTC)reply
I don't understand and have not seen this sort of nomination before. Did
174.58.224.221 approach you and ask for help with this nomination? If not, it is definitely your nomination. If so, that doesn't relieve you of
WP:BEFORE responsibilities or take away your authority to withdraw. ~
KvnG14:33, 12 October 2013 (UTC)reply
174.IP put up the deletion tag and a rationale on the talkpage. IIRC unregistered users can't create new AfD pages, so I finished it for them.
Ansh66618:26, 12 October 2013 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.