- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Sources confirm it's happening and I can't see this AFD going any other way so wrapping it up ( non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 03:07, 8 December 2015 (UTC)
Brazil at the 2017 World Games
- Brazil at the 2017 World Games ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
2017 = WP:CRYSTAL, WP:TOOSOON. Mr. Guye ( talk) 14:40, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. Mr. Guye ( talk) 14:40, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
- Delete, an article cannot sustain itself with so little content, specially when it deals with something happening so far in the future. Victão Lopes Fala! 15:47, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
- Keep per WP:CRYSTAL - "1.Individual scheduled or expected future events should be included only if the event is notable and almost certain to take place" Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 08:23, 2 December 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 02:39, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 02:39, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
- Keep per WP:TOOSOON: "If sources do not exist, it is generally too soon for an article on that topic to be considered." There are sources stating that athletes from Brazil secured qualification, so it is not too soon to create the article, even though it still has very limited content. -- ThiagoSimoes ( talk) 05:13, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Sources confirm it's happening and I can't see this AFD going any other way so wrapping it up ( non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 03:07, 8 December 2015 (UTC)
Brazil at the 2017 World Games
- Brazil at the 2017 World Games ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
2017 = WP:CRYSTAL, WP:TOOSOON. Mr. Guye ( talk) 14:40, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. Mr. Guye ( talk) 14:40, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
- Delete, an article cannot sustain itself with so little content, specially when it deals with something happening so far in the future. Victão Lopes Fala! 15:47, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
- Keep per WP:CRYSTAL - "1.Individual scheduled or expected future events should be included only if the event is notable and almost certain to take place" Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 08:23, 2 December 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 02:39, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 02:39, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
- Keep per WP:TOOSOON: "If sources do not exist, it is generally too soon for an article on that topic to be considered." There are sources stating that athletes from Brazil secured qualification, so it is not too soon to create the article, even though it still has very limited content. -- ThiagoSimoes ( talk) 05:13, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.