- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 10:04, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Boundstone (area) ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No meaningful content sourceable about it per WP:N; at most should be a couple of lines of Rowledge, it is just a residential sub-neighbourhood. - Adam37 Talk 15:43, 16 December 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 23:41, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 23:41, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
- Merge to Rowledge Although it is an OS settlement, it isn't a census designated place, it isn't in the Domesday Book or in Vision of Britain. It should also be moved to Boundstone, Surrey. Crouch, Swale ( talk) 15:07, 20 December 2018 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ifnord ( talk) 03:04, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ifnord ( talk) 03:04, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
- Delete Unsourced so nothing to merge. I couldn't verify Boundstone is part of Rowledge. It is, for example, in a different electoral district ward [1]. A better target for Boundstone, Surrey would be Farnham. There is something of note with regard to the geology and the prehistoric occupation of Boundstone which could merit discussion somewhere.-- Pontificalibus 11:27, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kpg jhp jm 05:53, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kpg jhp jm 05:53, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
- Delete - I would agree with a merge, but as Pontificalibus points out, without citations, nothing to merge. Couldn't find anything to verify the info in the article.
Onel5969
TT me
12:14, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
- It is mentioned at
Rowledge but unsourced, if noting else we could just redirect to
List of United Kingdom locations: Bou-Boz#Bou.
Crouch, Swale (
talk)
10:56, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
- A redirect from this title would be misleading. The OS says it's a village - we have no sources supporting the claim that Boundstone is an "area".--
Pontificalibus
11:31, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
- Given that it was only moved to this title in January, I'd be happy with moving this to Boundstone, Surrey without leaving a redirect, then merging/redirecting. Crouch, Swale ( talk) 11:35, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
- A redirect from this title would be misleading. The OS says it's a village - we have no sources supporting the claim that Boundstone is an "area".--
Pontificalibus
11:31, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
- It is mentioned at
Rowledge but unsourced, if noting else we could just redirect to
List of United Kingdom locations: Bou-Boz#Bou.
Crouch, Swale (
talk)
10:56, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:V. Charles ( talk) 10:36, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
- Note Residents' comments submitted to the Waverley Borough Council Rowledge Local Governance Review make it clear that the relationship between Boundstone and Rowledge is clearly not the one described in the current article. I consquently regard this edit to be POV-pushing and an example of why we shouldn't allow articles like this to exist without sources.-- Pontificalibus 14:02, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
- Comment I have now added some content for the church. Crouch, Swale ( talk) 16:10, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 10:04, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Boundstone (area) ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No meaningful content sourceable about it per WP:N; at most should be a couple of lines of Rowledge, it is just a residential sub-neighbourhood. - Adam37 Talk 15:43, 16 December 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 23:41, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 23:41, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
- Merge to Rowledge Although it is an OS settlement, it isn't a census designated place, it isn't in the Domesday Book or in Vision of Britain. It should also be moved to Boundstone, Surrey. Crouch, Swale ( talk) 15:07, 20 December 2018 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ifnord ( talk) 03:04, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ifnord ( talk) 03:04, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
- Delete Unsourced so nothing to merge. I couldn't verify Boundstone is part of Rowledge. It is, for example, in a different electoral district ward [1]. A better target for Boundstone, Surrey would be Farnham. There is something of note with regard to the geology and the prehistoric occupation of Boundstone which could merit discussion somewhere.-- Pontificalibus 11:27, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kpg jhp jm 05:53, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kpg jhp jm 05:53, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
- Delete - I would agree with a merge, but as Pontificalibus points out, without citations, nothing to merge. Couldn't find anything to verify the info in the article.
Onel5969
TT me
12:14, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
- It is mentioned at
Rowledge but unsourced, if noting else we could just redirect to
List of United Kingdom locations: Bou-Boz#Bou.
Crouch, Swale (
talk)
10:56, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
- A redirect from this title would be misleading. The OS says it's a village - we have no sources supporting the claim that Boundstone is an "area".--
Pontificalibus
11:31, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
- Given that it was only moved to this title in January, I'd be happy with moving this to Boundstone, Surrey without leaving a redirect, then merging/redirecting. Crouch, Swale ( talk) 11:35, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
- A redirect from this title would be misleading. The OS says it's a village - we have no sources supporting the claim that Boundstone is an "area".--
Pontificalibus
11:31, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
- It is mentioned at
Rowledge but unsourced, if noting else we could just redirect to
List of United Kingdom locations: Bou-Boz#Bou.
Crouch, Swale (
talk)
10:56, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:V. Charles ( talk) 10:36, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
- Note Residents' comments submitted to the Waverley Borough Council Rowledge Local Governance Review make it clear that the relationship between Boundstone and Rowledge is clearly not the one described in the current article. I consquently regard this edit to be POV-pushing and an example of why we shouldn't allow articles like this to exist without sources.-- Pontificalibus 14:02, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
- Comment I have now added some content for the church. Crouch, Swale ( talk) 16:10, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.