The result was KEEP (no consensus). TigerShark ( talk) 00:57, 21 January 2008 (UTC) reply
I am nominating this article as a neutral party. Concerns have been expressed that the title of the article is a neologism. Related to that concern, some editors expressed the connected belief that the article is inherently contrary to NPOV and unavoidably original research. Whether or not the topic is notable as such is another related issue. Vassyana ( talk) 16:50, 14 January 2008 (UTC) reply
This is a somewhat controversial topic. Please try to keep cool and polite. I politely request that participants strike out any inappropriate comments. Thanks. Vassyana ( talk) 09:32, 17 January 2008 (UTC) reply |
Regards. The Dragon of Bosnia ( talk) 15:15, 18 January 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was KEEP (no consensus). TigerShark ( talk) 00:57, 21 January 2008 (UTC) reply
I am nominating this article as a neutral party. Concerns have been expressed that the title of the article is a neologism. Related to that concern, some editors expressed the connected belief that the article is inherently contrary to NPOV and unavoidably original research. Whether or not the topic is notable as such is another related issue. Vassyana ( talk) 16:50, 14 January 2008 (UTC) reply
This is a somewhat controversial topic. Please try to keep cool and polite. I politely request that participants strike out any inappropriate comments. Thanks. Vassyana ( talk) 09:32, 17 January 2008 (UTC) reply |
Regards. The Dragon of Bosnia ( talk) 15:15, 18 January 2008 (UTC) reply