- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 12:32, 14 April 2018 (UTC)
- Borani Village ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable village in India, don't see the reason to have it even as a stub. Bbarmadillo ( talk) 19:06, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
- Speedy keep — Per the very first criterion of WP:GEOLAND, which states that:
Populated, legally recognized places] are typically presumed to be notable, even if their population is very low. Even abandoned places can remain notable, because notability encompasses their entire history. One exception is that census tracts are usually not considered notable.
- There is also strong precedent regarding this. So, notability — in this case — is inherent.
Regards, SshibumXZ ( Talk) ( Contributions). 19:14, 8 April 2018 (UTC); edited 14:14, 12 September 2018 (UTC). - Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. WeAreAllHere talk 19:23, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 20:16, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
- Keep. There is no such thing a non-notable village in Wikipedia. Recognized populated places are notable regardless of size. • Gene93k ( talk) 20:56, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
- Comment – As already pointed out by others, it clearly meets WP:GEOLAND – [1]. - NitinMlk ( talk) 21:19, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
- Keep as per the others and per WP:5PILLARS. -- Oakshade ( talk) 17:54, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
- Keep as per the ones above. It's notable as a populated place. SportingFlyer talk 04:16, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 12:32, 14 April 2018 (UTC)
- Borani Village ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable village in India, don't see the reason to have it even as a stub. Bbarmadillo ( talk) 19:06, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
- Speedy keep — Per the very first criterion of WP:GEOLAND, which states that:
Populated, legally recognized places] are typically presumed to be notable, even if their population is very low. Even abandoned places can remain notable, because notability encompasses their entire history. One exception is that census tracts are usually not considered notable.
- There is also strong precedent regarding this. So, notability — in this case — is inherent.
Regards, SshibumXZ ( Talk) ( Contributions). 19:14, 8 April 2018 (UTC); edited 14:14, 12 September 2018 (UTC). - Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. WeAreAllHere talk 19:23, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 20:16, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
- Keep. There is no such thing a non-notable village in Wikipedia. Recognized populated places are notable regardless of size. • Gene93k ( talk) 20:56, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
- Comment – As already pointed out by others, it clearly meets WP:GEOLAND – [1]. - NitinMlk ( talk) 21:19, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
- Keep as per the others and per WP:5PILLARS. -- Oakshade ( talk) 17:54, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
- Keep as per the ones above. It's notable as a populated place. SportingFlyer talk 04:16, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.