- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge to Doctor Strange. The only exclusive keep argument did not cite any policy-based reasons (plus one other argument which simply cited the first one). -- RoySmith (talk) 14:06, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
Book of the Vishanti
- Book of the Vishanti ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This is a minor facet of Doctor Strange that does not have sources to establish independent notability. It does not require coverage outside of the parent article. TTN ( talk) 00:09, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. TTN ( talk) 00:10, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
- Strong Keep, it's a very large facet of Doc Strange, please read the accurate page to see its importance in the storyline. Quite notable. In need of cites, but the leap from no cites on a notable topic to delete is huge indeed, and should be taken rarely. Randy Kryn 00:14, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
- That argument has nothing to do with satisfying the notability guideline. That's your own personal interpretation of some vague scale of notability. That's an attitude more suited to Wikia where this kind of information is freely welcome. It's certainly not impossible for a topic like this to establish notability, but sources need to be put forth to actually show that. As it stands, this deserves all of two sentences in the main article. TTN ( talk) 00:36, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
- Keep or merge to Doctor Strange. BOZ ( talk) 21:24, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
- Keep per Randy Kryn. FreeKnowledgeCreator ( talk) 05:36, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
- Merge to Doctor Strange#Powers and abilities. Not notable outside of fictional context. Argento Surfer ( talk) 16:04, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 19:42, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, B E C K Y S A Y L E S 09:14, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, B E C K Y S A Y L E S 09:14, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
- Merge to Doctor Strange#Powers and abilities. Samat lib ( talk) 07:10, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
- Merge to Doctor Strange. Fictional character is notable enough for his own article but not everything associated with him. Stuff like this belongs in fictional character's article not as an article of its own. SJK ( talk) 03:09, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge to Doctor Strange. The only exclusive keep argument did not cite any policy-based reasons (plus one other argument which simply cited the first one). -- RoySmith (talk) 14:06, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
Book of the Vishanti
- Book of the Vishanti ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This is a minor facet of Doctor Strange that does not have sources to establish independent notability. It does not require coverage outside of the parent article. TTN ( talk) 00:09, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. TTN ( talk) 00:10, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
- Strong Keep, it's a very large facet of Doc Strange, please read the accurate page to see its importance in the storyline. Quite notable. In need of cites, but the leap from no cites on a notable topic to delete is huge indeed, and should be taken rarely. Randy Kryn 00:14, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
- That argument has nothing to do with satisfying the notability guideline. That's your own personal interpretation of some vague scale of notability. That's an attitude more suited to Wikia where this kind of information is freely welcome. It's certainly not impossible for a topic like this to establish notability, but sources need to be put forth to actually show that. As it stands, this deserves all of two sentences in the main article. TTN ( talk) 00:36, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
- Keep or merge to Doctor Strange. BOZ ( talk) 21:24, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
- Keep per Randy Kryn. FreeKnowledgeCreator ( talk) 05:36, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
- Merge to Doctor Strange#Powers and abilities. Not notable outside of fictional context. Argento Surfer ( talk) 16:04, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 19:42, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, B E C K Y S A Y L E S 09:14, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, B E C K Y S A Y L E S 09:14, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
- Merge to Doctor Strange#Powers and abilities. Samat lib ( talk) 07:10, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
- Merge to Doctor Strange. Fictional character is notable enough for his own article but not everything associated with him. Stuff like this belongs in fictional character's article not as an article of its own. SJK ( talk) 03:09, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.