The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Owen× ☎ 23:38, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
It doesn't appear to meet WP:ORG / WP:GNG, or have a suitable WP:ATD. Has been in CAT:NN for 14 years, so hopefully we can now resolve it. Worthy organisation, but I am not convinced it is notable. Boleyn ( talk) 15:49, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Owen× ☎ 23:38, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
It doesn't appear to meet WP:ORG / WP:GNG, or have a suitable WP:ATD. Has been in CAT:NN for 14 years, so hopefully we can now resolve it. Worthy organisation, but I am not convinced it is notable. Boleyn ( talk) 15:49, 10 February 2024 (UTC)