- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Kpg jhp jm 01:50, 19 September 2018 (UTC)
Bondo (putty)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Bondo (putty) ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This subject fails both GNG and WP:CORPDEPTH. No reliable secondary sources are cited to establish notability. After and extensive search on Google including the regular search engine, news, and Google Scholar I have not been able to find any sources that would establish notability. There is no reasonable expectation that this article can be improved beyond its current state in the future. Lovelylinda1980 ( talk) 23:59, 12 September 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. KCVelaga ( talk) 04:58, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Lovelylinda1980 ( talk) 10:35, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
- Keep, like Thinsulate, this is an established and well known brand, which has been covered in many reliable sources over many years. — Frayæ ( Talk/ Spjall) 22:07, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
- Please point me towards these reliable secondary sources that establish notability for Bondo. I would love to be proven wrong. If someone can come up with those sources I will get to work building the article up myself.
Lovelylinda1980 (
talk)
23:52, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
- All I have been looking at is previous revisions of the article and Highbeam. — Frayæ ( Talk/ Spjall) 08:56, 14 September 2018 (UTC)
- Keep. Meets WP:GNG with sources cited in the article, as well as significant coverage from Core77 ( [1] [2] [3]). — Newslinger talk 12:41, 14 September 2018 (UTC)
- Keep per above. Brad v 07:32, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
- Keep. Very common well-established brand/product. Easily meets GNG. Softlavender ( talk) 05:58, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
- Keep - Major consumer product with ample coverage for a GNG pass. Carrite ( talk) 06:44, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
- Keep Improved now passes GNG etc per work done. Widefox; talk 13:20, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Kpg jhp jm 01:50, 19 September 2018 (UTC)
Bondo (putty)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Bondo (putty) ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This subject fails both GNG and WP:CORPDEPTH. No reliable secondary sources are cited to establish notability. After and extensive search on Google including the regular search engine, news, and Google Scholar I have not been able to find any sources that would establish notability. There is no reasonable expectation that this article can be improved beyond its current state in the future. Lovelylinda1980 ( talk) 23:59, 12 September 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. KCVelaga ( talk) 04:58, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Lovelylinda1980 ( talk) 10:35, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
- Keep, like Thinsulate, this is an established and well known brand, which has been covered in many reliable sources over many years. — Frayæ ( Talk/ Spjall) 22:07, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
- Please point me towards these reliable secondary sources that establish notability for Bondo. I would love to be proven wrong. If someone can come up with those sources I will get to work building the article up myself.
Lovelylinda1980 (
talk)
23:52, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
- All I have been looking at is previous revisions of the article and Highbeam. — Frayæ ( Talk/ Spjall) 08:56, 14 September 2018 (UTC)
- Keep. Meets WP:GNG with sources cited in the article, as well as significant coverage from Core77 ( [1] [2] [3]). — Newslinger talk 12:41, 14 September 2018 (UTC)
- Keep per above. Brad v 07:32, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
- Keep. Very common well-established brand/product. Easily meets GNG. Softlavender ( talk) 05:58, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
- Keep - Major consumer product with ample coverage for a GNG pass. Carrite ( talk) 06:44, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
- Keep Improved now passes GNG etc per work done. Widefox; talk 13:20, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.