The result was Keep as per unanimous positive consensus and the request by the nominator to close the debate in favor of keeping the article. A non-admin closure. And Adoil Descended ( talk) 00:53, 2 May 2012 (UTC) reply
This article is in conflict with WP:IRS, WP:NPOV it uses a few POV sources many times and is written from a single POV.
Newmanoconnor (
talk) 21:41, 25 April 2012 (UTC)
I'd like to request this be closed as keep. The article isn't remotely the same as when i nominated it for AfD.
Newmanoconnor (
talk) 03:15, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
reply
Keep - Sorry to be the devil's advocate today. This article does looks like one of those famous CIA sponsored articles, but neither points in the Afd had been demonstrated. We should be enforcing policy, not censoring Wikipedia.
Keep. Even though the initial form was somewhat rough, I think it is fairly evident at this point that the subject is notable. Shearonink ( talk) 03:15, 28 April 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was Keep as per unanimous positive consensus and the request by the nominator to close the debate in favor of keeping the article. A non-admin closure. And Adoil Descended ( talk) 00:53, 2 May 2012 (UTC) reply
This article is in conflict with WP:IRS, WP:NPOV it uses a few POV sources many times and is written from a single POV.
Newmanoconnor (
talk) 21:41, 25 April 2012 (UTC)
I'd like to request this be closed as keep. The article isn't remotely the same as when i nominated it for AfD.
Newmanoconnor (
talk) 03:15, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
reply
Keep - Sorry to be the devil's advocate today. This article does looks like one of those famous CIA sponsored articles, but neither points in the Afd had been demonstrated. We should be enforcing policy, not censoring Wikipedia.
Keep. Even though the initial form was somewhat rough, I think it is fairly evident at this point that the subject is notable. Shearonink ( talk) 03:15, 28 April 2012 (UTC) reply