The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete.—
Quarl(
talk) 2007-02-13 23:05Z
Weak delete. All those "hall of fame" mentions seem very suspicious to me, when mixed in with a
Who's who. Same kind of thing? If someone explains why not, my opinion would change to weak keep.
Mangojuicetalk17:58, 12 February 2007 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete.—
Quarl(
talk) 2007-02-13 23:05Z
Weak delete. All those "hall of fame" mentions seem very suspicious to me, when mixed in with a
Who's who. Same kind of thing? If someone explains why not, my opinion would change to weak keep.
Mangojuicetalk17:58, 12 February 2007 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.