- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Some discussion and some lamenting, but no one seems opposed to deletion here, barring better options. ~ Amory ( u • t • c) 11:00, 5 April 2019 (UTC)
Boletín de la Sociedad Geológica del Perú
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Boletín de la Sociedad Geológica del Perú ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable journal. Although it has been around for quite some time, it doesn't appear to have made much impact. Not indexed in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG. Randykitty ( talk) 07:20, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academic journals-related deletion discussions. Randykitty ( talk) 07:21, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of South America-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 07:39, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Peru-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 07:39, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. XOR'easter ( talk) 17:57, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
- Comment. A long-established journal of a national scientific society ought to be notable. Perhaps it was omitted from selective databases for being in Spanish. Is there a selective database that includes Spanish-language journals which might include it? I see some citations of articles published in the journal at this Google Scholar search. Eastmain ( talk • contribs) 22:55, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
- Comment Both Scopus and the Science Citation Index Expanded list plenty Spanish-language journals. I think the problem here is more that Peru is not a "science heavyweight" so that this journal has not had much impact outside of the local geological society. There are non-selective Spanish-language databases ( SciELO, for example) but even those don't list this. -- Randykitty ( talk) 09:57, 29 March 2019 (UTC)
- My preferred outcome would be a merge to Sociedad Geológica del Perú if we had that article. But we don't. So I must think. Headbomb { t · c · p · b} 11:31, 29 March 2019 (UTC)
- Not sure that the society itself is actually notable... -- Randykitty ( talk) 11:45, 29 March 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Some discussion and some lamenting, but no one seems opposed to deletion here, barring better options. ~ Amory ( u • t • c) 11:00, 5 April 2019 (UTC)
Boletín de la Sociedad Geológica del Perú
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Boletín de la Sociedad Geológica del Perú ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable journal. Although it has been around for quite some time, it doesn't appear to have made much impact. Not indexed in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG. Randykitty ( talk) 07:20, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academic journals-related deletion discussions. Randykitty ( talk) 07:21, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of South America-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 07:39, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Peru-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 07:39, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. XOR'easter ( talk) 17:57, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
- Comment. A long-established journal of a national scientific society ought to be notable. Perhaps it was omitted from selective databases for being in Spanish. Is there a selective database that includes Spanish-language journals which might include it? I see some citations of articles published in the journal at this Google Scholar search. Eastmain ( talk • contribs) 22:55, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
- Comment Both Scopus and the Science Citation Index Expanded list plenty Spanish-language journals. I think the problem here is more that Peru is not a "science heavyweight" so that this journal has not had much impact outside of the local geological society. There are non-selective Spanish-language databases ( SciELO, for example) but even those don't list this. -- Randykitty ( talk) 09:57, 29 March 2019 (UTC)
- My preferred outcome would be a merge to Sociedad Geológica del Perú if we had that article. But we don't. So I must think. Headbomb { t · c · p · b} 11:31, 29 March 2019 (UTC)
- Not sure that the society itself is actually notable... -- Randykitty ( talk) 11:45, 29 March 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.