The result was keep. The concern of no independent sources to support notability claims has been addressed, it seems. / ƒETCH COMMS / 03:31, 23 April 2011 (UTC) reply
There is no assertion of notability of this minor Tolkien character; the only sources in the article are the books themselves, and I cannot find any evidence in reliable sources that Boldog is notable in real life. No attempt has been made to write this from a real-world perspective, and this just serves as a narration of the character's appearances in books. I think there are many other similar articles that fail the notability guidelines in the same way, but it is best to just try one out for now. BigDom ( talk) 09:58, 14 April 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. The concern of no independent sources to support notability claims has been addressed, it seems. / ƒETCH COMMS / 03:31, 23 April 2011 (UTC) reply
There is no assertion of notability of this minor Tolkien character; the only sources in the article are the books themselves, and I cannot find any evidence in reliable sources that Boldog is notable in real life. No attempt has been made to write this from a real-world perspective, and this just serves as a narration of the character's appearances in books. I think there are many other similar articles that fail the notability guidelines in the same way, but it is best to just try one out for now. BigDom ( talk) 09:58, 14 April 2011 (UTC) reply