The result was delete, I guess. Not an easy one, and the problem that other users haved edited the article (which excludes it from CSD G7) made this a tricky close. However, per Moreschi conservatism is best, and the consensus from this debate is that this person isn't notable enough. However, please also remember that a subject's wishes aren't always the wishes of the community; however, in this case, they were. Daniel Bryant 04:12, 23 March 2007 (UTC) reply
Procedural nomination. Editor claiming to be the article's subject blanked the page, requesting deletion. I'm neutral myself. TexasAndroid 14:45, 16 March 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was delete, I guess. Not an easy one, and the problem that other users haved edited the article (which excludes it from CSD G7) made this a tricky close. However, per Moreschi conservatism is best, and the consensus from this debate is that this person isn't notable enough. However, please also remember that a subject's wishes aren't always the wishes of the community; however, in this case, they were. Daniel Bryant 04:12, 23 March 2007 (UTC) reply
Procedural nomination. Editor claiming to be the article's subject blanked the page, requesting deletion. I'm neutral myself. TexasAndroid 14:45, 16 March 2007 (UTC) reply