From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. I'm also moving it to Blue Mountain City. Geschichte ( talk) 08:40, 1 November 2020 (UTC) reply

Blue Mountain, California

Blue Mountain, California (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There is a Blue Mountain in California, but it is two counties away, and I have searched the entire length of Licking Fork and not found anything that could possibly be this place, nor can I find a text reference that is definitely about such a place. Plainly not notable. Mangoe ( talk) 21:54, 20 October 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 22:26, 20 October 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 22:26, 20 October 2020 (UTC) reply
Thanks, I added the "Gold Districts of California" citation and added the destination URL and PDF to archive.org. Cxbrx ( talk) 21:10, 21 October 2020 (UTC) reply
thanks all:) Coolabahapple ( talk) 13:23, 22 October 2020 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, T. Canens ( talk) 04:13, 28 October 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Keep If it passed requirements at one time then it passes requirements now. We have articles on former settlements with little more than a mound structure that's been excavated by archaeologist and well we should. Articles on former settlements, villages and towns should be kept when they can be verified through reliable maps, books and documentation. -- Tsistunagiska ( talk) 14:33, 28 October 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Keep. In the past , there would have been noquestion, but our requirements have tightened, and we must judge by the present rules. I think there's enough evidence here, even using them. There's probably enough in the sources to expand the article. DGG ( talk ) 06:14, 31 October 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. I'm also moving it to Blue Mountain City. Geschichte ( talk) 08:40, 1 November 2020 (UTC) reply

Blue Mountain, California

Blue Mountain, California (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There is a Blue Mountain in California, but it is two counties away, and I have searched the entire length of Licking Fork and not found anything that could possibly be this place, nor can I find a text reference that is definitely about such a place. Plainly not notable. Mangoe ( talk) 21:54, 20 October 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 22:26, 20 October 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 22:26, 20 October 2020 (UTC) reply
Thanks, I added the "Gold Districts of California" citation and added the destination URL and PDF to archive.org. Cxbrx ( talk) 21:10, 21 October 2020 (UTC) reply
thanks all:) Coolabahapple ( talk) 13:23, 22 October 2020 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, T. Canens ( talk) 04:13, 28 October 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Keep If it passed requirements at one time then it passes requirements now. We have articles on former settlements with little more than a mound structure that's been excavated by archaeologist and well we should. Articles on former settlements, villages and towns should be kept when they can be verified through reliable maps, books and documentation. -- Tsistunagiska ( talk) 14:33, 28 October 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Keep. In the past , there would have been noquestion, but our requirements have tightened, and we must judge by the present rules. I think there's enough evidence here, even using them. There's probably enough in the sources to expand the article. DGG ( talk ) 06:14, 31 October 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook