The result was delete. Consensus is that the article does not meet the notability guidelines. Davewild ( talk) 17:46, 27 October 2011 (UTC) reply
Previously speedy deleted and then recreated. The article was then proded by another editor [1] and then deproded by an anon ip [2] without addressing the concern of, "No evidence of notability. The sources largely consist of pages barely mentioning Blue Line, not mentioning it, and promotional pages. The article is also promotional in tone, and perhaps qualifies for speedy deletion for that reason." My own research has been unable to turn up significant reliable source coverage, and has found mostly press releases, social media content, and passing mentions. ConcernedVancouverite ( talk) 15:56, 13 October 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Consensus is that the article does not meet the notability guidelines. Davewild ( talk) 17:46, 27 October 2011 (UTC) reply
Previously speedy deleted and then recreated. The article was then proded by another editor [1] and then deproded by an anon ip [2] without addressing the concern of, "No evidence of notability. The sources largely consist of pages barely mentioning Blue Line, not mentioning it, and promotional pages. The article is also promotional in tone, and perhaps qualifies for speedy deletion for that reason." My own research has been unable to turn up significant reliable source coverage, and has found mostly press releases, social media content, and passing mentions. ConcernedVancouverite ( talk) 15:56, 13 October 2011 (UTC) reply