- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 19:35, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Blok IV, Podgorica ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
References do not support the one-sentence claim. Only one to include "blok" appears to be the public transport one that lists line 7 "Stari aerodrom - Blok VI - IX (Probna linija sa izmjenom postojeće trase – produžetak do bloka IX)" This refers to bloks 6 to 9; meanwhile List of Podgorica neighbourhoods and suburbs says that only bloks 5, 6, and 9 kept the "blok" designation. No mention of Blok 4. Imaginatorium ( talk) 18:43, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Imaginatorium ( talk) 18:43, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Montenegro-related deletion discussions. Imaginatorium ( talk) 18:43, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
- Delete Mass-produced sub-stub with little care taken to include details of individual articles. "Neighbourhood is not an administrative category, but unofficial geographical notion", and sources do not support notability of a residential locality with this name. Reywas92 Talk 21:11, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
- Delete not enough content to be a useful article, and no sources provided to improve it. Peter James ( talk) 22:29, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
- Delete "unofficial geographical notion"s aren't actually a topic. Reyk YO! 11:55, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 19:35, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Blok IV, Podgorica ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
References do not support the one-sentence claim. Only one to include "blok" appears to be the public transport one that lists line 7 "Stari aerodrom - Blok VI - IX (Probna linija sa izmjenom postojeće trase – produžetak do bloka IX)" This refers to bloks 6 to 9; meanwhile List of Podgorica neighbourhoods and suburbs says that only bloks 5, 6, and 9 kept the "blok" designation. No mention of Blok 4. Imaginatorium ( talk) 18:43, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Imaginatorium ( talk) 18:43, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Montenegro-related deletion discussions. Imaginatorium ( talk) 18:43, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
- Delete Mass-produced sub-stub with little care taken to include details of individual articles. "Neighbourhood is not an administrative category, but unofficial geographical notion", and sources do not support notability of a residential locality with this name. Reywas92 Talk 21:11, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
- Delete not enough content to be a useful article, and no sources provided to improve it. Peter James ( talk) 22:29, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
- Delete "unofficial geographical notion"s aren't actually a topic. Reyk YO! 11:55, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.