The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. As others have noted, the content of this article was indeed a word-for-word duplicate of the content at
The Unknowns.
Mz7 (
talk) 06:29, 23 January 2018 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
ansh666 02:27, 16 January 2018 (UTC)reply
Delete. This article is almost a letter-for-letter a duplicate of
The Unknowns, which is the actual name of this group. — Warren. ‘ talk , 06:22, 16 January 2018 (UTC)reply
Delete for precisely the reason
Warren. points out. I can't find anything on "black punk" as a hacker group; even when searching with keywords like "hacking" "internet", "FBI" what turns up in searches is punk music. DO NOT redirect because the term Black punk is in very wide use to describe
punk rock, so that keeping this title even as a redirect would cause needless confusion.
E.M.Gregory (
talk) 13:07, 21 January 2018 (UTC)reply
Delete as hoax/fork/duplicate of
The Unknowns. Note creator place misleading reference titles so that the false name would seem to appear. e.g.
"NASA, ESA confirm they were hacked by 'Black Punk'". Retrieved May 7, 2012. "NASA, ESA confirm they were hacked by 'Black Punk'" actually leads to "title= NASA, ESA confirm they were hacked by 'The Unknowns'"
Icewhiz (
talk) 13:23, 21 January 2018 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. As others have noted, the content of this article was indeed a word-for-word duplicate of the content at
The Unknowns.
Mz7 (
talk) 06:29, 23 January 2018 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
ansh666 02:27, 16 January 2018 (UTC)reply
Delete. This article is almost a letter-for-letter a duplicate of
The Unknowns, which is the actual name of this group. — Warren. ‘ talk , 06:22, 16 January 2018 (UTC)reply
Delete for precisely the reason
Warren. points out. I can't find anything on "black punk" as a hacker group; even when searching with keywords like "hacking" "internet", "FBI" what turns up in searches is punk music. DO NOT redirect because the term Black punk is in very wide use to describe
punk rock, so that keeping this title even as a redirect would cause needless confusion.
E.M.Gregory (
talk) 13:07, 21 January 2018 (UTC)reply
Delete as hoax/fork/duplicate of
The Unknowns. Note creator place misleading reference titles so that the false name would seem to appear. e.g.
"NASA, ESA confirm they were hacked by 'Black Punk'". Retrieved May 7, 2012. "NASA, ESA confirm they were hacked by 'Black Punk'" actually leads to "title= NASA, ESA confirm they were hacked by 'The Unknowns'"
Icewhiz (
talk) 13:23, 21 January 2018 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.