The result was keep. especially in light of the article improvements that have happened since this page was nominated for deletion. Liz Read! Talk! 21:22, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
Seasonal lake doesn't seem to meet WP:GNG - lacks in-depth coverage in reliable sources. MrsSnoozyTurtle 10:27, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previously nominated via
WP:PROD, ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
12:06, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
Named natural features are often notable, provided information beyond statistics and coordinates is known to exist. This includes mountains, lakes, streams, islands, etc.and this meets that criteria, based on the information that I just added, that I found by searching in google books. There is some uncited material in the article, but it all seems credible to me, based on what I read in the various sources that mention them. It is not clear to me the extent to which WP:GNG is met, due to the length of content in each article, but I think that consensus is that WP:GEOLAND has a lower bar and I think this passes it. CT55555 ( talk) 15:48, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. especially in light of the article improvements that have happened since this page was nominated for deletion. Liz Read! Talk! 21:22, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
Seasonal lake doesn't seem to meet WP:GNG - lacks in-depth coverage in reliable sources. MrsSnoozyTurtle 10:27, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previously nominated via
WP:PROD, ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
12:06, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
Named natural features are often notable, provided information beyond statistics and coordinates is known to exist. This includes mountains, lakes, streams, islands, etc.and this meets that criteria, based on the information that I just added, that I found by searching in google books. There is some uncited material in the article, but it all seems credible to me, based on what I read in the various sources that mention them. It is not clear to me the extent to which WP:GNG is met, due to the length of content in each article, but I think that consensus is that WP:GEOLAND has a lower bar and I think this passes it. CT55555 ( talk) 15:48, 27 July 2022 (UTC)