The result was delete. Mark Arsten ( talk) 15:31, 17 October 2012 (UTC) reply
Page cites no reliable source for the subject matter; title itself is just a neologism; with the how-to content removed, what remains is mixed factoids already found other other related pages. I did search for reliable sources that support the topic and found none. E8 ( talk) 07:40, 10 October 2012 (UTC) reply
CommentTo note: statement above is simply copy and pasted dispite changes made to the page. Cultural alternative fuels written an recorded existance cannot hinge on the pleasing of a few lobbiest copy and pasting canned messages. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 38.103.168.4 ( talk) 21:21, 11 October 2012 (UTC) reply
CommentRecomend not to delete page for the following reasons: Page has source quoted from chemistry text book. "Organic Chemistry"/ Francis A. Carey & Robert M. Giuliano, New York.
CommentFuel itself is described as a nickname of "black diesel" and is infact describes a cultural popular formula and process. It is a popular cultural nickname and is very abundenlty discussed the world over through many mediums. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 38.103.168.4 ( talk) 21:08, 11 October 2012 (UTC) reply
CommentCandidly wondering whats the sudden modivation to focus on page deletion so aggresivly. Actions seem consistant with growing number of products reaching the market that are using the popular concept. Seems it will cause competion over used oil and offer fuel alternatives to consumers, ever so slightly breaking fuel suppliers monopolies.
Comment User E8 is erasing the content thats been there for a few years over and over. If he requests a discussion, it is not his right to delete the content that is to be discussed. I request E8 to be blocked fron the page. There seems to be a serious bias in connection to his actions. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 38.103.168.4 ( talk) 21:54, 11 October 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Mark Arsten ( talk) 15:31, 17 October 2012 (UTC) reply
Page cites no reliable source for the subject matter; title itself is just a neologism; with the how-to content removed, what remains is mixed factoids already found other other related pages. I did search for reliable sources that support the topic and found none. E8 ( talk) 07:40, 10 October 2012 (UTC) reply
CommentTo note: statement above is simply copy and pasted dispite changes made to the page. Cultural alternative fuels written an recorded existance cannot hinge on the pleasing of a few lobbiest copy and pasting canned messages. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 38.103.168.4 ( talk) 21:21, 11 October 2012 (UTC) reply
CommentRecomend not to delete page for the following reasons: Page has source quoted from chemistry text book. "Organic Chemistry"/ Francis A. Carey & Robert M. Giuliano, New York.
CommentFuel itself is described as a nickname of "black diesel" and is infact describes a cultural popular formula and process. It is a popular cultural nickname and is very abundenlty discussed the world over through many mediums. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 38.103.168.4 ( talk) 21:08, 11 October 2012 (UTC) reply
CommentCandidly wondering whats the sudden modivation to focus on page deletion so aggresivly. Actions seem consistant with growing number of products reaching the market that are using the popular concept. Seems it will cause competion over used oil and offer fuel alternatives to consumers, ever so slightly breaking fuel suppliers monopolies.
Comment User E8 is erasing the content thats been there for a few years over and over. If he requests a discussion, it is not his right to delete the content that is to be discussed. I request E8 to be blocked fron the page. There seems to be a serious bias in connection to his actions. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 38.103.168.4 ( talk) 21:54, 11 October 2012 (UTC) reply