From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 08:42, 8 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Black Canyon High School

Black Canyon High School (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

School doesn't actually exist yet. WP:TOOSOON. Zackmann08 ( Talk to me/ What I been doing) 15:51, 30 September 2016 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Jim Carter 15:59, 30 September 2016 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Jim Carter 15:59, 30 September 2016 (UTC) reply
  • Delete because this is actually an example of why WP:CRYSTAL is a thing. It turns out that after community pushback over the school name and the mascot (the Black Canyon Phantoms), the district is going to rename the school (and its mascot) to... something else, which hasn't been determined yet. So not only does this not exist yet, it never will in the manner presented in this article. As an aside, part of that consideration is that there's an existing Black Canyon High School in the state: an alternative education public high school in Emmett, Idaho, for which we don't currently have an article. Squeamish Ossifrage ( talk) 16:37, 30 September 2016 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Idaho-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 17:04, 30 September 2016 (UTC) reply
  • Speedy delete - In a classic WP:NOTNOTBURO a drive by editor removed an uncontested prod that was just about ready to expire because a typically under prepared NPP volunteer had made an obviously good faith error and used the explanation NOTYET instead of TOOSOON. CRYSTAL per Squeamish Ossifrage; speedy because this shouldn't even be here at AFD and I can't see any way this should be kept. John from Idegon ( talk) 22:55, 2 October 2016 (UTC) reply
  • Delete. I would say merge to school district if the article existed. There will be a high school, but its identity is still being worked out. [1] Not quite there for WP:V. • Gene93k ( talk) 00:13, 3 October 2016 (UTC) reply
  • Delete: per WP:CRYSTAL. Article can be recreated if and when it becomes notable (i.e. exists). Safehaven86 ( talk) 03:54, 3 October 2016 (UTC) reply
  • Delete: per WP:CRYSTAL. I've known school projects like this to be shelved up to within 3 months of the scheduled start of construction It only needs a minor change in the constitution of city hall. A bit tongue in cheek too, putting a photo of the desert on the page. Whatever next! Kudpung กุดผึ้ง ( talk) 09:16, 5 October 2016 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 08:42, 8 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Black Canyon High School

Black Canyon High School (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

School doesn't actually exist yet. WP:TOOSOON. Zackmann08 ( Talk to me/ What I been doing) 15:51, 30 September 2016 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Jim Carter 15:59, 30 September 2016 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Jim Carter 15:59, 30 September 2016 (UTC) reply
  • Delete because this is actually an example of why WP:CRYSTAL is a thing. It turns out that after community pushback over the school name and the mascot (the Black Canyon Phantoms), the district is going to rename the school (and its mascot) to... something else, which hasn't been determined yet. So not only does this not exist yet, it never will in the manner presented in this article. As an aside, part of that consideration is that there's an existing Black Canyon High School in the state: an alternative education public high school in Emmett, Idaho, for which we don't currently have an article. Squeamish Ossifrage ( talk) 16:37, 30 September 2016 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Idaho-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 17:04, 30 September 2016 (UTC) reply
  • Speedy delete - In a classic WP:NOTNOTBURO a drive by editor removed an uncontested prod that was just about ready to expire because a typically under prepared NPP volunteer had made an obviously good faith error and used the explanation NOTYET instead of TOOSOON. CRYSTAL per Squeamish Ossifrage; speedy because this shouldn't even be here at AFD and I can't see any way this should be kept. John from Idegon ( talk) 22:55, 2 October 2016 (UTC) reply
  • Delete. I would say merge to school district if the article existed. There will be a high school, but its identity is still being worked out. [1] Not quite there for WP:V. • Gene93k ( talk) 00:13, 3 October 2016 (UTC) reply
  • Delete: per WP:CRYSTAL. Article can be recreated if and when it becomes notable (i.e. exists). Safehaven86 ( talk) 03:54, 3 October 2016 (UTC) reply
  • Delete: per WP:CRYSTAL. I've known school projects like this to be shelved up to within 3 months of the scheduled start of construction It only needs a minor change in the constitution of city hall. A bit tongue in cheek too, putting a photo of the desert on the page. Whatever next! Kudpung กุดผึ้ง ( talk) 09:16, 5 October 2016 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook