From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Vanamonde ( Talk) 21:22, 14 September 2019 (UTC) reply

Bissan Rafe

Bissan Rafe (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The only SIGCOV article I can find is this one. There are a couple smaller items mentioned in the article under references, but overall I think this is WP:TOOSOON to meet our GNG guideline. ThatMontrealIP ( talk) 14:36, 7 September 2019 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. ThatMontrealIP ( talk) 14:36, 7 September 2019 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. ThatMontrealIP ( talk) 14:36, 7 September 2019 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Palestine-related deletion discussions. ThatMontrealIP ( talk) 14:36, 7 September 2019 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. ThatMontrealIP ( talk) 14:36, 7 September 2019 (UTC) reply
I merged two of the sources in the version you mention as meeting GNG. There were three sources written by Frederico Cao; of these two had identical content but slightly different titles. Merged. It's worth noting Frederico Cao's two articles, which are largely similar, are the only instances of real SIGCOV. ThatMontrealIP ( talk) 13:12, 8 September 2019 (UTC) reply
Greetings, Vexations. The input in AfD discussions of the subject of the article (be it an organisation, or a person) or its creator does not enjoy any kind of privilege over other editors'. The AfD is decided on the merit of policy-based arguments. (There are cases of potentially harmful BLPs, of course.) - The Gnome ( talk) 13:37, 14 September 2019 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 14:48, 12 September 2019 (UTC) reply
Correction. NOT G5 eligible since author ban came after creation, but still voting this way per author not caring. - 2pou ( talk) 04:30, 13 September 2019 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Vanamonde ( Talk) 21:22, 14 September 2019 (UTC) reply

Bissan Rafe

Bissan Rafe (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The only SIGCOV article I can find is this one. There are a couple smaller items mentioned in the article under references, but overall I think this is WP:TOOSOON to meet our GNG guideline. ThatMontrealIP ( talk) 14:36, 7 September 2019 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. ThatMontrealIP ( talk) 14:36, 7 September 2019 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. ThatMontrealIP ( talk) 14:36, 7 September 2019 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Palestine-related deletion discussions. ThatMontrealIP ( talk) 14:36, 7 September 2019 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. ThatMontrealIP ( talk) 14:36, 7 September 2019 (UTC) reply
I merged two of the sources in the version you mention as meeting GNG. There were three sources written by Frederico Cao; of these two had identical content but slightly different titles. Merged. It's worth noting Frederico Cao's two articles, which are largely similar, are the only instances of real SIGCOV. ThatMontrealIP ( talk) 13:12, 8 September 2019 (UTC) reply
Greetings, Vexations. The input in AfD discussions of the subject of the article (be it an organisation, or a person) or its creator does not enjoy any kind of privilege over other editors'. The AfD is decided on the merit of policy-based arguments. (There are cases of potentially harmful BLPs, of course.) - The Gnome ( talk) 13:37, 14 September 2019 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 14:48, 12 September 2019 (UTC) reply
Correction. NOT G5 eligible since author ban came after creation, but still voting this way per author not caring. - 2pou ( talk) 04:30, 13 September 2019 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook