The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Keep. I managed to scrape together an article that should demonstrate
WP:GNG. It'd be easier to get sources on the subject if she didn't have like five different names she's used at various times. –MJL‐Talk‐☖06:46, 8 September 2019 (UTC)reply
I merged two of the sources in the version you mention as meeting GNG. There were three sources written by Frederico Cao; of these two had identical content but slightly different titles. Merged. It's worth noting Frederico Cao's two articles, which are largely similar, are the only instances of real SIGCOV.
ThatMontrealIP (
talk)
13:12, 8 September 2019 (UTC)reply
Greetings,
Vexations. The input in AfD discussions of the subject of the article (be it an organisation, or a person) or its creator does not enjoy any kind of privilege over other editors'. The AfD is decided on the merit of policy-based arguments. (There are cases of potentially harmful BLPs, of course.) -
The Gnome (
talk)
13:37, 14 September 2019 (UTC)reply
Delete per
Vexations comment, but even more so, I think this would be eligible for a
WP:G5 speedy delete. Hopefully MJL didnt spend too much on the improvements after bringing this to attention... sorry... -
2pou (
talk)
04:23, 13 September 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Keep. I managed to scrape together an article that should demonstrate
WP:GNG. It'd be easier to get sources on the subject if she didn't have like five different names she's used at various times. –MJL‐Talk‐☖06:46, 8 September 2019 (UTC)reply
I merged two of the sources in the version you mention as meeting GNG. There were three sources written by Frederico Cao; of these two had identical content but slightly different titles. Merged. It's worth noting Frederico Cao's two articles, which are largely similar, are the only instances of real SIGCOV.
ThatMontrealIP (
talk)
13:12, 8 September 2019 (UTC)reply
Greetings,
Vexations. The input in AfD discussions of the subject of the article (be it an organisation, or a person) or its creator does not enjoy any kind of privilege over other editors'. The AfD is decided on the merit of policy-based arguments. (There are cases of potentially harmful BLPs, of course.) -
The Gnome (
talk)
13:37, 14 September 2019 (UTC)reply
Delete per
Vexations comment, but even more so, I think this would be eligible for a
WP:G5 speedy delete. Hopefully MJL didnt spend too much on the improvements after bringing this to attention... sorry... -
2pou (
talk)
04:23, 13 September 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.