The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Non-notable village unsupported by references. Article is peacock and original research beyond repair with any attempts at salvage or highlighting reverted by what appears to be sock puppets.
PRehse (
talk)
10:39, 17 November 2018 (UTC)reply
Keep I know that this article is not perfect but I told you that I am working to improve it. I will imply my improvements soon but it is not fair to delete anyone's article on personal problems.
PRehse If you have any conflict with me, Talk with me! we can negotiate it.
Atizaz Kiyani (
talk) 15:55, 17 November 2018 (UTC) vote from sockpuppeteer struck
WOPR (
talk)
02:19, 22 November 2018 (UTC)reply
I've struck your second keep, you are only entitled to !vote once. You are also not entitled to close this discussion, please do not try to do that again. The article requires far more than minor edits. Large swathes have been repeatedly removed and reinserted (by you) which are entirely inappropriate for Wikipedia.
SpinningSpark15:46, 17 November 2018 (UTC)reply
Update: I have added alot of new citations and references as well as sources to verify the source of this article
Bishandot. From now on, anyone can edit
Bishandot with relevant information and no one is allowed to revert it without a serious cause.
Raja Atizaz Ahmed Kiyani (
talk) 09:40, 18 November 2018 (UTC) comment from sockpuppeteer struck
WOPR (
talk)
02:19, 22 November 2018 (UTC)reply
I've refactored your post into a more conventional form (ie, new posts to the bottom rather than inserted in the nomination statement). Please read
WP:OWN. You cannot tell other editors what they can do with the article.
SpinningSpark11:04, 18 November 2018 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Non-notable village unsupported by references. Article is peacock and original research beyond repair with any attempts at salvage or highlighting reverted by what appears to be sock puppets.
PRehse (
talk)
10:39, 17 November 2018 (UTC)reply
Keep I know that this article is not perfect but I told you that I am working to improve it. I will imply my improvements soon but it is not fair to delete anyone's article on personal problems.
PRehse If you have any conflict with me, Talk with me! we can negotiate it.
Atizaz Kiyani (
talk) 15:55, 17 November 2018 (UTC) vote from sockpuppeteer struck
WOPR (
talk)
02:19, 22 November 2018 (UTC)reply
I've struck your second keep, you are only entitled to !vote once. You are also not entitled to close this discussion, please do not try to do that again. The article requires far more than minor edits. Large swathes have been repeatedly removed and reinserted (by you) which are entirely inappropriate for Wikipedia.
SpinningSpark15:46, 17 November 2018 (UTC)reply
Update: I have added alot of new citations and references as well as sources to verify the source of this article
Bishandot. From now on, anyone can edit
Bishandot with relevant information and no one is allowed to revert it without a serious cause.
Raja Atizaz Ahmed Kiyani (
talk) 09:40, 18 November 2018 (UTC) comment from sockpuppeteer struck
WOPR (
talk)
02:19, 22 November 2018 (UTC)reply
I've refactored your post into a more conventional form (ie, new posts to the bottom rather than inserted in the nomination statement). Please read
WP:OWN. You cannot tell other editors what they can do with the article.
SpinningSpark11:04, 18 November 2018 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.