The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MBisanztalk 00:38, 14 September 2015 (UTC)reply
Every reference either only mentions the journal's existence, like in a list, or is in actuality a fradulent impact factor company or
predatory publisher. This is just another one of the garbage journals that have been popping up in the last three years. All of the sources cited are eitherreliableor include significant coverage of the journal, never both.
Ashenai (
talk) 15:08, 6 September 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete. No secondary sources establishing notability.
Gamaliel (
talk) 19:24, 6 September 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete. Does not seem to meet
WP:NJournals - The nine papers indexed by Google Scholar did not receive any citation and cannot see evidence of the journal being considered a reliable source. Too new a journal to be included at this moment. — TaqPoltalkcontrib 07:56, 7 September 2015 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MBisanztalk 00:38, 14 September 2015 (UTC)reply
Every reference either only mentions the journal's existence, like in a list, or is in actuality a fradulent impact factor company or
predatory publisher. This is just another one of the garbage journals that have been popping up in the last three years. All of the sources cited are eitherreliableor include significant coverage of the journal, never both.
Ashenai (
talk) 15:08, 6 September 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete. No secondary sources establishing notability.
Gamaliel (
talk) 19:24, 6 September 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete. Does not seem to meet
WP:NJournals - The nine papers indexed by Google Scholar did not receive any citation and cannot see evidence of the journal being considered a reliable source. Too new a journal to be included at this moment. — TaqPoltalkcontrib 07:56, 7 September 2015 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.