The result was redirect to Unity Party of America and delete history per CSD G4. Ron Ritzman ( talk) 22:42, 8 April 2012 (UTC) reply
Non-notable politician. Recreation of a deleted page which went through AFD. Never held an "international, national or sub-national office." Only three news sources in the article can be found, and Bill is the subject of only one of those, the other two have him as a passing mention. The article where he is the subject is a local news report on his local election campaign, doesn't satisfy significant press coverage. The rest of the available sources are primary sources not reliable sources Coffeepusher ( talk) 15:20, 1 April 2012 (UTC) reply
The thing is, notability has already been established. This article has been on Wikipedia for years. A past campaign is still a campaign, and a mention in the Denver Post outside a political context certainly says something.
If news websites don't properly maintain their archives, that's irrelevant to the fact that the subject remains notable. Once notable, always notable. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Houston1969 ( talk • contribs) 01:31, 2 April 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was redirect to Unity Party of America and delete history per CSD G4. Ron Ritzman ( talk) 22:42, 8 April 2012 (UTC) reply
Non-notable politician. Recreation of a deleted page which went through AFD. Never held an "international, national or sub-national office." Only three news sources in the article can be found, and Bill is the subject of only one of those, the other two have him as a passing mention. The article where he is the subject is a local news report on his local election campaign, doesn't satisfy significant press coverage. The rest of the available sources are primary sources not reliable sources Coffeepusher ( talk) 15:20, 1 April 2012 (UTC) reply
The thing is, notability has already been established. This article has been on Wikipedia for years. A past campaign is still a campaign, and a mention in the Denver Post outside a political context certainly says something.
If news websites don't properly maintain their archives, that's irrelevant to the fact that the subject remains notable. Once notable, always notable. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Houston1969 ( talk • contribs) 01:31, 2 April 2012 (UTC) reply