From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:30, 22 January 2018 (UTC) reply

Big Wolf Marketing

Big Wolf Marketing (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NCORP. No significant coverage in secondary sources found. RetiredDuke ( talk) 11:04, 14 January 2018 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Baby miss fortune 11:19, 14 January 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Baby miss fortune 11:20, 14 January 2018 (UTC) reply
  • Delete per User:RetiredDuke's rationale. The company doesn't pass WP:CORPDEPTH. It also seems like it may have been created as a thinly veiled attempt to name and shame a not notable individual. Chetsford ( talk) 13:55, 17 January 2018 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:30, 22 January 2018 (UTC) reply

Big Wolf Marketing

Big Wolf Marketing (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NCORP. No significant coverage in secondary sources found. RetiredDuke ( talk) 11:04, 14 January 2018 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Baby miss fortune 11:19, 14 January 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Baby miss fortune 11:20, 14 January 2018 (UTC) reply
  • Delete per User:RetiredDuke's rationale. The company doesn't pass WP:CORPDEPTH. It also seems like it may have been created as a thinly veiled attempt to name and shame a not notable individual. Chetsford ( talk) 13:55, 17 January 2018 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook