- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. Sandstein 21:16, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
- Big Nose Freaks Out ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Can see a GamePower review ( https://archive.org/details/GamePower_Ano_2_No._16_1993-10_Nova_Cultural_BR_pt?q="Big+Nose+Freaks+Out") and that's it. Coin945 ( talk) 11:45, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays! Baby miss fortune 13:03, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays! Baby miss fortune 13:03, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays! Baby miss fortune 13:03, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, A Train talk 12:08, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, A Train talk 12:08, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
- Keep - MobyGames keeps a list of 4 reviews for the game - 4 reviews. Those publications should really be enough to pass WP:GNG. Lee Vilenski( talk) 12:44, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
- Delete Some of the aforementioned Mobygames reviews are not contemporaneous, and not significant. Fails WP:GNG. ZXCVBNM ( TALK) 05:34, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 09:46, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 09:46, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
- There is already a list article of the gamemakers games. It seems it wpuld be indie to merge so I favor keeping the article as it has some notability and coverage. FloridaArmy ( talk) 15:57, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 03:52, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 03:52, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. Sandstein 21:16, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
- Big Nose Freaks Out ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Can see a GamePower review ( https://archive.org/details/GamePower_Ano_2_No._16_1993-10_Nova_Cultural_BR_pt?q="Big+Nose+Freaks+Out") and that's it. Coin945 ( talk) 11:45, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays! Baby miss fortune 13:03, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays! Baby miss fortune 13:03, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays! Baby miss fortune 13:03, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, A Train talk 12:08, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, A Train talk 12:08, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
- Keep - MobyGames keeps a list of 4 reviews for the game - 4 reviews. Those publications should really be enough to pass WP:GNG. Lee Vilenski( talk) 12:44, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
- Delete Some of the aforementioned Mobygames reviews are not contemporaneous, and not significant. Fails WP:GNG. ZXCVBNM ( TALK) 05:34, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 09:46, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 09:46, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
- There is already a list article of the gamemakers games. It seems it wpuld be indie to merge so I favor keeping the article as it has some notability and coverage. FloridaArmy ( talk) 15:57, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 03:52, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 03:52, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.