From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Daniel ( talk) 09:31, 4 September 2021 (UTC) reply

Bharatiya Jain Sanghatana

Bharatiya Jain Sanghatana (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Thee seem to be insufficient substantial 3rd party reliable published sources, not press releases or blogs or postings or mere notices See also Draft:Shantilal Muttha and Draft:Shantilal Muttha Foundation , which seem part of the same PR campaign. DGG ( talk ) 05:57, 13 August 2021 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Eastmain ( talkcontribs) 08:38, 13 August 2021 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Eastmain ( talkcontribs) 08:39, 13 August 2021 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 09:03, 20 August 2021 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Less Unless ( talk) 09:02, 28 August 2021 (UTC) reply
  • Weak Delete While the current sourcing is insufficient to establish notability per WP:NORG, there could be non-English or offline sources. I'd be happy to change my vote if other sources are presented. -- Ab207 ( talk) 15:24, 3 September 2021 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Daniel ( talk) 09:31, 4 September 2021 (UTC) reply

Bharatiya Jain Sanghatana

Bharatiya Jain Sanghatana (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Thee seem to be insufficient substantial 3rd party reliable published sources, not press releases or blogs or postings or mere notices See also Draft:Shantilal Muttha and Draft:Shantilal Muttha Foundation , which seem part of the same PR campaign. DGG ( talk ) 05:57, 13 August 2021 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Eastmain ( talkcontribs) 08:38, 13 August 2021 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Eastmain ( talkcontribs) 08:39, 13 August 2021 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 09:03, 20 August 2021 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Less Unless ( talk) 09:02, 28 August 2021 (UTC) reply
  • Weak Delete While the current sourcing is insufficient to establish notability per WP:NORG, there could be non-English or offline sources. I'd be happy to change my vote if other sources are presented. -- Ab207 ( talk) 15:24, 3 September 2021 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook