- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Joyous! | Talk 21:51, 7 November 2022 (UTC)
BeyondSims
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- BeyondSims ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 24#BeyondSims. Pinging people involved in RfD: A7V2, Pizzaplayer219, Mdewman6, and Jay. Clyde! Franklin! 21:00, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
- Delete: I don’t really have any experience in AFD but looking at the article, there are only about two reliable sources, while the other sources rely on primary sourcing. Pizzaplayer219 Talk Contribs 21:04, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: News media, Video games, and Websites. Skynxnex ( talk) 21:17, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
- Delete weakly sourced fancruft. LizardJr8 ( talk) 22:47, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
- Delete - A routine fansite that fails WP:GNG. The GamesRader piece is a somewhat trivial mention of a past incarnation of the website, but even if it was extremely in-depth, it by itself certainly is not enough to establish notability. - Aoidh ( talk) 02:34, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
- Belated ping with apologies to
IceWelder, who
WP:BLARed this. —
Clyde!
Franklin! 07:07, 7 November 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks for the ping! The BLAR might have happened five years ago but the sourcing situation remains unchanged. WP:CSE only returns three hits of this site being mentioned trivially. Incidentally, all three even refer to the same event. Hence, I would also support Delete. IceWelder [ ✉] 08:16, 7 November 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Joyous! | Talk 21:51, 7 November 2022 (UTC)
BeyondSims
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- BeyondSims ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 24#BeyondSims. Pinging people involved in RfD: A7V2, Pizzaplayer219, Mdewman6, and Jay. Clyde! Franklin! 21:00, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
- Delete: I don’t really have any experience in AFD but looking at the article, there are only about two reliable sources, while the other sources rely on primary sourcing. Pizzaplayer219 Talk Contribs 21:04, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: News media, Video games, and Websites. Skynxnex ( talk) 21:17, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
- Delete weakly sourced fancruft. LizardJr8 ( talk) 22:47, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
- Delete - A routine fansite that fails WP:GNG. The GamesRader piece is a somewhat trivial mention of a past incarnation of the website, but even if it was extremely in-depth, it by itself certainly is not enough to establish notability. - Aoidh ( talk) 02:34, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
- Belated ping with apologies to
IceWelder, who
WP:BLARed this. —
Clyde!
Franklin! 07:07, 7 November 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks for the ping! The BLAR might have happened five years ago but the sourcing situation remains unchanged. WP:CSE only returns three hits of this site being mentioned trivially. Incidentally, all three even refer to the same event. Hence, I would also support Delete. IceWelder [ ✉] 08:16, 7 November 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.