The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Keep: Awarded the gold medal of the Alliance française of Paris in the examination for the Diplôme Supérieur. Youngest woman candidate in the 'flapper election' of 1929, the first to grant the vote to young women, so her candidacy epitomised that election.
Graemp (
talk) 09:04, 12 March 2016 (UTC)reply
Keep Excellent article; lots of content and sources.
Andrew D. (
talk) 18:45, 12 March 2016 (UTC)reply
Keep Notability is determined not by how many elections you have won, but how the press received you. As
Graemp pointed out, she was notable for other reasons.
Megalibrarygirl (
talk) 00:14, 14 March 2016 (UTC)reply
Keep There is no serious reason to delete.
Berti118 (
talk) 20:03, 16 March 2016 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Keep: Awarded the gold medal of the Alliance française of Paris in the examination for the Diplôme Supérieur. Youngest woman candidate in the 'flapper election' of 1929, the first to grant the vote to young women, so her candidacy epitomised that election.
Graemp (
talk) 09:04, 12 March 2016 (UTC)reply
Keep Excellent article; lots of content and sources.
Andrew D. (
talk) 18:45, 12 March 2016 (UTC)reply
Keep Notability is determined not by how many elections you have won, but how the press received you. As
Graemp pointed out, she was notable for other reasons.
Megalibrarygirl (
talk) 00:14, 14 March 2016 (UTC)reply
Keep There is no serious reason to delete.
Berti118 (
talk) 20:03, 16 March 2016 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.