The result was keep. The main argument of the nominator is that this zoo doesn't exist. It has been demonstrated that it does. However, there hasn't been a lot of discussion about its notability. No prejudice against a speedy renomination if someone wishes to discuss its notability. ( non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman ( talk) 00:24, 21 July 2009 (UTC) reply
Possible hoax. I can find no sources to prove existence. I am saying hoax because of the title. Best Zoo is probably just implying that some zoo is the best. Gordonrox24 | Talk 01:56, 14 July 2009 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. The main argument of the nominator is that this zoo doesn't exist. It has been demonstrated that it does. However, there hasn't been a lot of discussion about its notability. No prejudice against a speedy renomination if someone wishes to discuss its notability. ( non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman ( talk) 00:24, 21 July 2009 (UTC) reply
Possible hoax. I can find no sources to prove existence. I am saying hoax because of the title. Best Zoo is probably just implying that some zoo is the best. Gordonrox24 | Talk 01:56, 14 July 2009 (UTC) reply