The result was delete. Consensus is that the sources provided are not (quite) enough to establish notability. The opinions of the single purpose accounts were discounted. Sandstein 16:35, 29 July 2008 (UTC) reply
Deleted by Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bernard Edlington and messily again at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bernard Edlington2 which went to DRV which overturned on procedural grounds: the article is different from the 2007 and the AfD was not allowed to run properly. However: the article, the deletion review and the deleted version were all the work of the same editor, who has few other contributions to the project. The editor's name is Nexusb, and guess what the subject's company is called? Yes, you guessed it, Nexus. So it is not stretching the bounds of credulity at all to infer that Nexusb is someone from Nexus whose name starts with B. Maybe even Bernard, you never know. WP:COI, WP:SPA and possible WP:AUTO aside, the assertions of notability are not noticeably stronger than when previously deleted, and fall well short of compelling. Not CSD#A7 material, but several at DRV felt that it fell below WP:N by a tidy margin. I agree, and consensus is to relist, so here it is. Guy ( Help!) 19:56, 23 July 2008 (UTC) reply
Update: deleted history at Special:Undelete/Image:Bernard_Edlington.jpg supports the hypothesis that Nexusb is or is closely associated with the subject. See also Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Nexusb. Guy ( Help!) 22:43, 26 July 2008 (UTC) reply
— Charicoo3 ( talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. WWGB ( talk) 10:55, 24 July 2008 (UTC) reply
— Chiewan ( talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. WWGB ( talk) 10:55, 24 July 2008 (UTC) reply
Unfortunately the only thing I have against the article is I think English speakers in Japan are easier to cover on Wikipedia. It's hard to create a bio. Much harder if it's in another language, I am sure the creator took a long time to make the page so for that reason alone he/she may have more of a vested interest than a native English speaker, maybe even a good reason for restoration? Yama88 ( talk) 05:13, 25 July 2008 (UTC)— Yama88 ( talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. Lankiveil ( speak to me) 11:49, 25 July 2008 (UTC) reply
I am very sorry if I was unclear, I did not mention anything regarding Japanese TV. What I meant by systemic bias was most of the sources are from Japanese published articles and the quick assumption that foreign published articles are insignificant. Honestly I also think the document is fairly slim, however it has been backed up. I just think you should be fair regarding foreign publications. Also if you read the article properly the guy is not a TV employee at all, it says that is where his career started. His achievements since 1997 are in (I assume mostly) feature film. The achievements are clear too describing "nature, motion and design with his own software and algorithms" with reference to published material. Yama88 ( talk) 13:55, 25 July 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Consensus is that the sources provided are not (quite) enough to establish notability. The opinions of the single purpose accounts were discounted. Sandstein 16:35, 29 July 2008 (UTC) reply
Deleted by Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bernard Edlington and messily again at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bernard Edlington2 which went to DRV which overturned on procedural grounds: the article is different from the 2007 and the AfD was not allowed to run properly. However: the article, the deletion review and the deleted version were all the work of the same editor, who has few other contributions to the project. The editor's name is Nexusb, and guess what the subject's company is called? Yes, you guessed it, Nexus. So it is not stretching the bounds of credulity at all to infer that Nexusb is someone from Nexus whose name starts with B. Maybe even Bernard, you never know. WP:COI, WP:SPA and possible WP:AUTO aside, the assertions of notability are not noticeably stronger than when previously deleted, and fall well short of compelling. Not CSD#A7 material, but several at DRV felt that it fell below WP:N by a tidy margin. I agree, and consensus is to relist, so here it is. Guy ( Help!) 19:56, 23 July 2008 (UTC) reply
Update: deleted history at Special:Undelete/Image:Bernard_Edlington.jpg supports the hypothesis that Nexusb is or is closely associated with the subject. See also Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Nexusb. Guy ( Help!) 22:43, 26 July 2008 (UTC) reply
— Charicoo3 ( talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. WWGB ( talk) 10:55, 24 July 2008 (UTC) reply
— Chiewan ( talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. WWGB ( talk) 10:55, 24 July 2008 (UTC) reply
Unfortunately the only thing I have against the article is I think English speakers in Japan are easier to cover on Wikipedia. It's hard to create a bio. Much harder if it's in another language, I am sure the creator took a long time to make the page so for that reason alone he/she may have more of a vested interest than a native English speaker, maybe even a good reason for restoration? Yama88 ( talk) 05:13, 25 July 2008 (UTC)— Yama88 ( talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. Lankiveil ( speak to me) 11:49, 25 July 2008 (UTC) reply
I am very sorry if I was unclear, I did not mention anything regarding Japanese TV. What I meant by systemic bias was most of the sources are from Japanese published articles and the quick assumption that foreign published articles are insignificant. Honestly I also think the document is fairly slim, however it has been backed up. I just think you should be fair regarding foreign publications. Also if you read the article properly the guy is not a TV employee at all, it says that is where his career started. His achievements since 1997 are in (I assume mostly) feature film. The achievements are clear too describing "nature, motion and design with his own software and algorithms" with reference to published material. Yama88 ( talk) 13:55, 25 July 2008 (UTC) reply