The result was delete. The strongest arguments showed there were not sufficient sources to meet WP:GNG or WP:GEOFEAT. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 17:15, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
This arguably could have been speedied given that it's a 4th class PO sourced to Durham with no GNIS trace and no likely candidate on the topos, but since there is a second source, here we are. Unfortunately that source also identifies it only as a PO, so I see a failure of notability here. Mangoe ( talk) 16:25, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. The strongest arguments showed there were not sufficient sources to meet WP:GNG or WP:GEOFEAT. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 17:15, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
This arguably could have been speedied given that it's a 4th class PO sourced to Durham with no GNIS trace and no likely candidate on the topos, but since there is a second source, here we are. Unfortunately that source also identifies it only as a PO, so I see a failure of notability here. Mangoe ( talk) 16:25, 14 January 2021 (UTC)