The result was keep. The consensus here is the sources recently found meet GNG. All that is needed is for these references to make their way from this AFD to the article under discussion. Liz Read! Talk! 00:47, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
Biography of an artist, not reliably sourcing any strong claim to passing our inclusion criteria for artists. The strongest notability claim on offer here is that he and his work existed, which isn't an instant inclusion freebie in the absence of WP:GNG-worthy coverage and analysis about the impact of his work, but this is completely unsourced and even on a WP:BEFORE search for other sources all I get is event calendar or directory listings, blogs and glancing namechecks of his existence in coverage of other things rather than real reliable source coverage that's substantively about him. Simply having existed is not "inherently" notable enough to exempt him from having to pass GNG on his sourcing. Bearcat ( talk) 17:35, 15 December 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting to consider sources discovered by AllyD.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
19:41, 22 December 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Daniel (
talk)
00:44, 30 December 2022 (UTC)
The result was keep. The consensus here is the sources recently found meet GNG. All that is needed is for these references to make their way from this AFD to the article under discussion. Liz Read! Talk! 00:47, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
Biography of an artist, not reliably sourcing any strong claim to passing our inclusion criteria for artists. The strongest notability claim on offer here is that he and his work existed, which isn't an instant inclusion freebie in the absence of WP:GNG-worthy coverage and analysis about the impact of his work, but this is completely unsourced and even on a WP:BEFORE search for other sources all I get is event calendar or directory listings, blogs and glancing namechecks of his existence in coverage of other things rather than real reliable source coverage that's substantively about him. Simply having existed is not "inherently" notable enough to exempt him from having to pass GNG on his sourcing. Bearcat ( talk) 17:35, 15 December 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting to consider sources discovered by AllyD.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
19:41, 22 December 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Daniel (
talk)
00:44, 30 December 2022 (UTC)